Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.K.MOHAPATRA
Manmohan Biswal – Appellant
Versus
State of Odisha – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to appointment process under ocs (ra) rules (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. documentation and acknowledgement of applications (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. arbitrary action in appointing petitioners against group d posts (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. conduct of respondents and comparison with other cases (Para 18 , 19 , 22) |
| 5. issues raised in counter affidavits (Para 20 , 21) |
| 6. rejoinder regarding employment and prior judgments (Para 23 , 24) |
| 7. statutory provisions guiding compassionate appointments (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 8. authorities' obligation to act within statutory framework (Para 33 , 34) |
| 9. legal principle regarding qualifications for appointments (Para 35 , 36) |
| 10. discriminatory practices in appointment processes (Para 39 , 40 , 42) |
| 11. court's directive to ensure compliance with statutory rules (Para 43 , 44) |
Judgment :
A.K. Mohapatra, J.
1. Initially, the present Petitioners as applicants filed O.A. No.3829 of 2015 before Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack with a prayer to declare that the action of the Respondents-Opposite Parties in giving appointment to the applicants against Group D posts i.e. against posts of Night Watchmen
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
