SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Ori) 764

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
A.K. MOHAPATRA, J.
Manmohan Biswal and others - Petitioners
Versus
State of Odisha & others - Opp. Parties
WPC(OAC) No.3829 of 2015, WPC(OAC) No.3830 of 2015
Decided On : 27-01-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. S.D. Routray, S. Jena, S.K. Samal and Ms. P.Nath
For the Opposite Parties : Mr. S. Jena, Standing Counsel for School and Mass Education
Department

Petitioners, eligible for Group C posts under compassionate appointment guidelines, were unlawfully assigned to Group D positions. Court mandated reevaluation based on qualifications, upholding statutory provisions over executive decisions.

Headnote:(A) Odisha Civil Service (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rules, 1990 - Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 16 - Compassionate appointment - Petitioners' claim for Group C posts under OCS (RA) Rules was disregarded in favor of Group D posts - Court found the decision arbitrary and discriminatory as Petitioners possess requisite qualifications and Group C vacancies existed - Court emphasized that executive decisions should not override statutory rules. (Paras 1, 34, 42)

(B) Illegal Arbitrary Action - The Opposite Parties acted in an arbitrary and illegal manner, failing to consider qualifications for Group C posts and treating Petitioners discriminatorily compared to similarly situated individuals. (Paras 13, 42)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners, whose fathers died while in service, applied for jobs under the OCS (RA) Rules but were offered Group D posts instead of the Group C posts for which they qualified.

Findings of Court:
Court directed authorities to reconsider the appointments of the Petitioners for Group C positions, affirming that executive decisions cannot eclipse statutory regulations.

Issues: Whether the Petitioners' applications should be considered under the 1990 Rules and if their claims for Group C posts were legally justifiable.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court ruled that the authorities failed to act lawfully in not appointing the Petitioners to Group C posts despite their qualifications, as executive instructions do not supersede statutory provisions.

Result: Writ petitions allowed; Opposite Parties directed to issue appointment orders against vacant Group C posts.

Table of Content
1. challenge to appointment process under ocs (ra) rules (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5)
2. documentation and acknowledgement of applications (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. arbitrary action in appointing petitioners against group d posts (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. conduct of respondents and comparison with other cases (Para 18 , 19 , 22)
5. issues raised in counter affidavits (Para 20 , 21)
6. rejoinder regarding employment and prior judgments (Para 23 , 24)
7. statutory provisions guiding compassionate appointments (Para 30 , 31 , 32)
8. authorities' obligation to act within statutory framework (Para 33 , 34)
9. legal principle regarding qualifications for appointments (Para 35 , 36)
10. discriminatory practices in appointment processes (Para 39 , 40 , 42)
11. court's directive to ensure compliance with statutory rules (Para 43 , 44)

Judgment :

A.K. Mohapatra, J.

1. Initially, the present Petitioners as applicants filed O.A. No.3829 of 2015 before Odisha Administrative Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, Cuttack with a prayer to declare that the action of the Respondents-Opposite Parties in giving appointment to the applicants against Group D posts i.e. against posts of Night Watchmen-cum-Sweeper and further insisting that the applicants- Petitioners should sign agreement / undertaking for such Group D post is invalid in the eye of law and further prayed that the decision taken by the High Power Committee in its meeting dated 24.06.2016 under Annexure-8 be declared invalid and consequently the respondents-Opposite Parties be directed to revise and modify the appointment of the applicants by giving them appointment against vacant Group C posts befitting to their qualification and as has been done by them in case of 5th Phase Master List applicants.

2. After abolition of the Odisha Administrative Tribunal, the aforesaid Original Application has been transferred to this Court and has been registered as WPC (OAC) No.3829 of 2015.

3. Heard Mr. S.D. Routray, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners and Mr. S. Jena, learned Standing Counsel appearing for School and Mass Education Department -Opposite Parties.

4. The factual matrix of the case as culled out from the writ petition, in brief, is that the fathers of the present Petitioners, who were working as teachers in the district of Bhadrak since 1980 while working as such, the father of the Petitioner No.1, namely, Akshaya Kumar Biswal passed away on 27.02.2010 and father of the Petitioner No.2, namely, Himansu Kumar Deb passed away on 04.11.2010 and father of the Petitioner No.3, namely, Kartik Chandra Khandai died on 02.08.2011. The present Petitioners, who are surviving family members and looking after the family after the death of aforesaid three persons applied for job on compassionate ground under the Odisha Civil Service (Rehabilitation Assistance), Rule, 1990 (in short ‘OCS (RA) Rules, 1990’) which came into force by a Notification No.25585/GEN/ dated 13.09.1990 of General Administrative Department, Government of Odisha. Thereafter, the same has been renamed as Odisha Civil Service (Rehabilitation Assistance) Rule, 1990. Rehabilitation Assistance Scheme has been prepared to help the families and provide assistance to the families of the Government employees on compassionate ground, who have either died or likely to die while in harness. Such a scheme was prepared by the Government of Odisha to save the families of the Government servant from distress, immediately after the death of the employee in harness. The very idea is to provide assistant to a family of a Government servant and to mitigate their worries arising out of the sudden death of Government employee so that the family would not be forced to face starvation.

5. The Petitioners, immediately after the death of their fathers in the year 2010-2011 respectively, applied under the OCS (R.A.) Rules, 1990 for getting appointment against any vacant Government post befitting to their qualification and as is permissible unde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top