Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Sahasransu Sourav, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mrs. Saswata Patnaik, AGA

The court allowed the criminal appeal, indicating the presence of sufficient grounds for a favorable judgment.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section not specified - Criminal appeal - Appeal allowed in favor of appellant - Judgment pronounced in open court. (Para 3)

Facts of the case:
The case involves an appellant named Judhister Majhi against the State of Orissa in a criminal appeal. The appeal has been decided through hybrid mode, meaning a combination of in-person and virtual proceedings.

Findings of Court:
The court pronounced the judgment in favor of the appellant, allowing the appeal.

Issues: The primary issue noted is the outcome of the appeal itself, which was favorable to the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision to allow the appeal indicates that sufficient grounds were established for the judgment to be set aside or altered.

Result: Appeal is allowed.

Table of Content
1. introduction of the court proceedings. (Para 1)
2. outcome of the appeal. (Para 3)

ORDER :

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. Judgment pronounced in the open Court today and prepared in separate sheets.

3. In the result, the Appeal is allowed.