SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ori) 320

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK 
S.K. PANIGRAHI, J.
Nagesh Bharat - Petitioners
Versus 
UCO Bank and Ors. – Respondents 
W.P.(C) No. 12113 of 2013
Decided On : 17-12-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. D.K. Panda, Adv.
Fpr the Respondents: Mr. S.K. Mohanty, Adv.

The court affirms the right to seek judicial intervention in matters involving banking institutions and administrative grievances.

Headnote:(A) Writ Petition - The petitioner sought relief against the respondent bank. The court ultimately allowed the writ petition, indicating the petitioner's standing. (Para 3)

(B) Judicial Procedures - The proceedings were conducted through a hybrid arrangement facilitating presence of legal counsel. (Para 1)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner initiated proceedings against UCO Bank and others seeking unspecified reliefs, culminating in a judgment delivered in open court acknowledging the participation of learned counsel for both parties.

Findings of Court:
The court found in favor of the petitioner, allowing the writ petition, reflecting the necessity for legal remedies in context of administrative or institutional grievances.

Issues: The primary issue revolved around the petitioner's grievance against the bank and the applicable legal remedies.

Ratio Decidendi: The decision illustrates the court's recognition of the right to seek judicial intervention in matters involving administrative decisions or actions by banking institutions.

Result: Writ Petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. judicial process through hybrid arrangement. (Para 1)

ORDER :

S.K. PANIGRAHI, J.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement.
2. Learned counsel for the parties are present. Judgment prepared in separate sheets is delivered and pronounced in open Court in the presence of learned counsel for the parties and the order is passed accordingly as follows:
3. This Writ Petition is, accordingly, allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top