Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Muktesh Munda – Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy, J.
1. Since the claim made in the present batch of Writ Petitions are co-related to each other, all the matters were heard analogously and disposed of by the present common order.
2. While W.P.(C ) Nos.12819 of 2021, 14038 of 2021 to 14042 of 2021, 14044 of 2021, 22724 of 2021 and 22726 of 2021 have been filed challenging the rejection of the Petitioners’ claim to get the benefit of regularization, W.P(C) Nos.6788, 6877, 7057, 7237, 7239, 7241, 7479 and 9665 of 2021 have been filed by the Petitioners challenging the action of the Bank in issuing the Advertisement on different dates to fill up the posts in which Petitioners are continuing. Similarly W.P.(C ) Nos.1890 and 40542 of 2021 have been filed seeking a direction on the Opp. party-Bank to regularize the services of the Petitioners therein.
3. It is the case of the Petitioners that all the Petitioners are working in different branches of Punjab National Bank as Part Time Sweeper on daily wage basis from different dates. It is contended that all the Petitioners are continuing on daily wage basis as Part Time Sweeper and all were so engaged, while United Bank of India was functioning as a Govern
Long-term temporary employees in the public sector are entitled to regularization, with courts emphasizing fair treatment and adherence to constitutional principles over contractual labels.
Long-standing service without a formal appointment does not deny employees the right to regularization; discriminatory treatment of similarly situated employees violates principles of equity and fair....
Temporary or part-time employees cannot claim regularization merely based on length of service without sanctioned posts, and must seek remedies through the designated Industrial Tribunal.
The court ruled that employees engaged continuously for over ten years are entitled to regularization, regardless of irregular appointment status, reaffirming precedents from the Supreme Court highli....
Long-term daily wage employees, after 10 years of service, are entitled to regularization as established by Supreme Court principles in employment law.
The court reaffirmed that long-standing temporary employees, performing essential duties, must be regularized, rejecting claims of irregularity based solely on appointment processes without addressin....
Prolonged temporary employment without regularization contravenes labor rights; employers must ensure fair and stable employment as mandated by judicial principles.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
