IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
Muktesh Munda – Appellant
Versus
Punjab National Bank – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. batch of co-related writ petitions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners' employment background and claim for regularization. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments regarding maintainability of writ petitions. (Para 4) |
| 4. respondents' contention on alternative remedies. (Para 5) |
| 5. court's findings on employer-employee relationship. (Para 6) |
| 6. concluding orders and directions for compliance. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT :
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy, J.
1. Since the claim made in the present batch of Writ Petitions are co-related to each other, all the matters were heard analogously and disposed of by the present common order.
2. While W.P.(C ) Nos.12819 of 2021, 14038 of 2021 to 14042 of 2021, 14044 of 2021, 22724 of 2021 and 22726 of 2021 have been filed challenging the rejection of the Petitioners’ claim to get the benefit of regularization, W.P(C) Nos.6788, 6877, 7057, 7237, 7239, 7241, 7479 and 9665 of 2021 have been filed by the Petitioners challenging the action of the Bank in issuing the Advertisement on different dates to fill up the posts in which Petitioners are continuing. Similarly W.P.(C ) Nos.1890 and 40542 of 2021 have been filed seeking a direction on the Opp. party-Bank to regularize the ser
Bhola Nath Vs. State of Jharkhand and Others
Secretary, State of Karnataka and Others Vs. Uma Devi & Others
A.P. Foods V. S. Samuel & Others
U.P. State Bridge Corporation Vs. U.P. Rajya Setu Nigam
In City and Industrial Development Corporation Vs. Dosu Aardeshir Bhiwandiwala & Others
Long-term temporary employees in the public sector are entitled to regularization, with courts emphasizing fair treatment and adherence to constitutional principles over contractual labels.
Long-standing service without a formal appointment does not deny employees the right to regularization; discriminatory treatment of similarly situated employees violates principles of equity and fair....
Temporary or part-time employees cannot claim regularization merely based on length of service without sanctioned posts, and must seek remedies through the designated Industrial Tribunal.
The court ruled that employees engaged continuously for over ten years are entitled to regularization, regardless of irregular appointment status, reaffirming precedents from the Supreme Court highli....
Long-term daily wage employees, after 10 years of service, are entitled to regularization as established by Supreme Court principles in employment law.
The court reaffirmed that long-standing temporary employees, performing essential duties, must be regularized, rejecting claims of irregularity based solely on appointment processes without addressin....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.