Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD
M.NAGAPRASANNA
Javeed S/o Mahabub Attar – Appellant
Versus
Common Cadre Committee, Employees of Primary Co-operative Agriculture and Rural Development Banks – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following prayer:
a. To Issue writ in the nature of mandamus direct the respondents no.1 to 4 to regularize the service of the petitioner to his posts held by him in their 4th respondent banks from the date of their initiation appointment and to pay all monetary benefits by allowing this writ petition.
b. To Issue any other orders, directions as deems fit in the circumstances of the case.
2. Heard the learned counsel Sri.Shivaraj Mudhol for the petitioner, learned HCGP Smt.Girija Hiremath for the respondent Nos.2 and 3-State, the learned counsel Sri.P.R.Bentur appearing for respondent No.1 and the learned counsel Sri.K.H.Bagi appearing for respondent No.4.
3. The petitioner is initially employed by the Primary Co-operative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank. The petitioner is discharging his duties in respondent No.4-Bank which come under the supervision of the respondent No.1-Common Cadre Committee.
4. The petitioner was employed by the respondent No.4-Bank on 07.09.1995. The petitioner is said to be working even as on date in the respondent No.4-Bank as clerk/junior assistant on daily wages. The petitioner registers his
Long-standing service without a formal appointment does not deny employees the right to regularization; discriminatory treatment of similarly situated employees violates principles of equity and fair....
Long-standing service and fulfillment of criteria establish entitlement for regularization under service law, preventing arbitrary denial of rights.
Long-serving employees in essential roles are entitled to consideration for regularization despite initial irregular appointments, ensuring fairness and adherence to constitutional principles.
Regularization of long-serving daily wage employees is mandated after 10 years of service, acknowledging functional continuity despite initial irregularities, violating constitutional rights otherwis....
Long-term employees performing essential and continuous functions may claim regularization after a decade of service, despite previous procedural irregularities.
The court reaffirmed that long-serving employees, despite irregular appointments, are entitled to regularization, emphasizing the importance of continuity of service without considering minor lapses ....
Longstanding service in public roles warrants regularisation and cannot be arbitrarily denied based on technicalities; constitutional principles require fair treatment of employees.
Long-term employees, fulfilling essential duties, are entitled to regularization after 10 years of service despite irregular appointments, emphasizing fairness and preventing exploitation.
Long-term employees engaged in continuous service are entitled to regularization and benefits even post-retirement if their claims remain pending during their service, subject to compliance with appl....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
