Back
ANOOP CHITKARA
Narinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
| FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
| 83 | 04.04.2021 | Kotwali Kapurthala, District Kapurthala | 452, 307, 336, 148, 149 IPC, 1860 and Sections 25 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 |
1. The petitioners who have been arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the victim.
2. The gist of the allegations against the petitioners is that the police recorded the statement of Inderjit Singh under Section 154 Cr.P.C. in which he stated that on 04.04.2021 at about 4:00 p.m. he along with his son-Sher Singh and his partner-Banarasi Dass were sitting in the Haveli. At this time, three vehicles stopped there and 10-12 unknown persons alongwith Narinder Singh alias Lovely-the present petitioner and his son alighted from the vehicles. Narinder Singh was carrying a 12 bore double barrel gun and Nawab Singh was holding a revolver. After that
The non-compoundable nature of certain offenses and the societal impact are key considerations in determining the validity of a compromise for quashing criminal proceedings.
The court emphasized the non-compoundable nature of certain offences, the societal impact, and the importance of considering the seriousness of the offences before quashing proceedings.
The court's decision emphasized the reformatory nature of criminal jurisprudence and the societal impact of quashing criminal proceedings based on a compromise.
Non-compoundable offences with societal impact should not be quashed based solely on compromise.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court has the inherent power to quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between the parties, especially in cases where the offenc....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the absence of coercion in a compromise, the societal impact of the offences, and the reformatory purpose of criminal jurisprudence can justif....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's invocation of its inherent power under section 482 CrPC to quash the FIR and all subsequent proceedings based on the compromise, consid....
The main legal point established is that the voluntary settlement between the accused and the injured, the absence of impact on public peace, and the reformatory purpose of criminal jurisprudence jus....
The main legal point established is that the court can invoke its inherent jurisdiction under section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings based on a genuine compromise, even for non-compoundable o....
The main legal point established is the court's authority to exercise inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to quash proceedings based on a genuine compromise and the nature of the offenses, as supp....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
