ANOOP CHITKARA
Aman Lohan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara J. -
FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
493 | 02.11.2019 | Civil Line Kaithal, District Kaithal | 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 341 IPC, 1860 and Section 25 of the Arms Act 1959 |
The petitioner(s), arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the victim(s).
2. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the injured have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-2.
3. After that, the petitioners came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, the injured have been impleaded as respondent(s).
4. On 21-3-2022, the victim/ aggrieved person Deepak Kumar (R-3) and complainant aggrieved persons Amit Kumar (R-2) stated before the Special Judge Kaithal that they did not want to pursue the FIR against the accused. As per the concerned court's report dated 22 Mar 2022, the parties consented to the quashing of FIR and consequent proceedings without any threat.
ANALYSIS & REASONING:
5. The State's counsel has severely opposed this compromise and seeks dismissal of the petition be
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.