SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 31

ANOOP CHITKARA
Kailasho – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Dhruv Gupta, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. Manish Bansal, DAG

JUDGMENT :

Anoop Chitkara, J.

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

468

13.11.2021

Ambala City, District Ambala

21 & 29 of NDPS Act

1. The petitioner apprehending arrest for selling 12.71 grams of heroin to Dara Singh, the above-mentioned provisions of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act), from whose possession the Police had allegedly recovered the heroin, has come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail in the FIR captioned above. The petitioner is presently on interim bail granted by this Court.

2. Para 13 of the bail petition and status report mentions the following criminal history:

Sr. No.

FIR No.

Date

Offences under Sections

Police Station

1

439

03.03.2020

21 & 29 of NDPS Act

Ambala City, District Ambala

2.

225

21.06.2014

21 & 27 A of NDPS Act

Ambala City, District Ambala

3. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the custodial investigation would serve no purpose whatsoever, and the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top