SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 48

ANOOP CHITKARA
Ravi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. V.B. Godara, Advocate for the petitioner.
For the Respondent: Mr. Manish Bansal, DAG, Haryana.

JUDGMENT :

Anoop Chitkara, J.

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

509

28.11.2021

Rania, District Sirsa

21 of NDPS Act

1. The petitioner apprehending arrest for violating the above-mentioned provisions of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) per the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail.

2. As per bail application and the response of the State, one more case under Section 447 & 427 IPC is pending against the petitioner.

3. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the custodial investigation would serve no purpose whatsoever, and the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family.

4. On instructions from ASI Shishpal, learned counsel appearing for State opposes the bail and submits that the petitioner has criminal antecedents and the drug menace is spreading rapidly, and bail encourages the drug peddlers.

REASONING:

5. The quantity allegedly involved is 20 grams of heroin (Diacetyl morphine), which is less than commercial quantity

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top