ANOOP CHITKARA
Satvir Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J.
FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
161 | 23.06.2020 | Division No.2, District Police Commissionerate Ludhiana | 307, 324, 323, 341, 427, 506, 148, 149 IPC |
1. The petitioner, incarcerating upon his arrest in the FIR captioned above, came up before this Court under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail.
2. In paragraph 11 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents.
3. The accused party, who were armed with various weapons, inflicted various injuries on the complainant party, and the petitioner was named in FIR as one of the assailants. However, the case of the accused party is that there was a cross-case with opposite version, relating to the same incident and the present FIR was a counterblast and now the parties have settled their disputes, out of court.
4. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family. He further contends that coaccused Gurbhej Singh @ Kalu Bhatti as well as Pargat Singh @ sunny have already been granted concession of bail by this Court vide order dated 29.04.2022 passed in CRM-M-39753-2021 and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.