SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 726

ANOOP CHITKARA
Nachhatar Singh @ Soni – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Bhavdeep Singh Mamli, Advocate For the petitioner., for the Appellant; Mr. Rajat Gautam, DAG, Haryana., for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Anoop Chitkara, J. - The petitioner, incarcerating upon his arrest in the FIR captioned above, came up before this Court under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail.

FIR No.

Dated

Police Station

Sections

0147

07.07.2021

Sadar Ratia, District Fatehabad

392, 201, 411 & 34 IPC and Section 25 of Arms Act

2. In paragraph 16 of the bail application, as well as paragraph 11 of the status report, the accused has the following criminal antecedents:

Sr. No.

FIR No.

Date

Offences

Police Station

1

483

09.08.2015

15, 27A, 61 & 85 of NDPS Act

Ratia, District Fatehabad

2

485

10.08.2015

15, 61, 85 of NDPS Act

Sadar Ratia, District Fatehabad

3

57

08.06.2016

457, 380, 411 IPC

Ratia, Boha, Punjab

4

371

23.06.2017

160 IPC

Ratia, Distt. Fatehabad

5

342

08.06.2017

61, 01 & 14 of Excise and Taxation Act

Ratia, Distt. Fatehabad

6

96

06.05.2020

21-B, 61 & 85 of NDPS Act

City Ratia, Distt. Fatehabad

7

181

31.07.2020

148, 149, 323,

452 & 506 IPC

Sadar Ratia, Dis

      Click Here to Read the rest of this document
      1
      2
      3
      4
      5
      6
      7
      8
      9
      10
      11
      SupremeToday Portrait Ad
      supreme today icon
      logo-black

      An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

      Please visit our Training & Support
      Center or Contact Us for assistance

      qr

      Scan Me!

      India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

      For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

      whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
      whatsapp-icon Back to top