IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J.
Arushi Aggarwal & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Central Bureau Of Investigation – Respondent
CRM-M-15444-2016
Decided On : 01-04-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural aspects of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background of admissions under dasa scheme. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. investigation details regarding citizenship fraud. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. consequences of convictions for students. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 12) |
| 5. legal arguments regarding culpability. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. key legal principles in assessing culpability. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. court's final order to quash fir. (Para 39 , 40) |
JUDGMENT
Arvind Singh Sangwan, J. - Prayer in this petition is for quashing of FIR No.RC 0512010S008 dated 7.9.2010 under Sections 120-B, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC, registered at Police Station CBI, Chandigarh.
1. It is worth noticing that vide order dated 15.9.2016, the proceedings before the trial Court were stayed. Thereafter, an application for extension of time was moved and it was directed to hear the main case.
2. Accordingly, the main case is taken up and heard in the urgent hearing.
3. Learned Senior counsel for the petitioners submits that an FIR was registered against 11 students, who were around the age of 18 years with the allegations that all of them have taken admission in Punjab Engineering College, Sector 12, Chandigarh under the Direct Admission of Students Abroad Scheme-2010 (DASA-2010) during the academic sessions 2010-11 posing themselves to be citizens of Nepal.
4. It is stated that the said scheme has come into force w.e.f. 2001-02 as per the Government of India's directions, which was primarily to streamline the admission of foreign nationals studying in India as well as Indian students studying abroad in Undergraduate Engineering Programmes in centrally funded engineering institutions, other than Indian Institutes of Technology and for all the foreign students, who were eligible and 15% of the total number of seats, were reserved.
5. Learned Senior counsel submits that as per the case of the prosecution, all the 11 students by submitting the Nepalese Citizenship Card have applied in the aforesaid category and were granted admissions which were centrally coordinated and conducted by NITK, Surathkal, Karnataka, which was to verify the copies of the required documents of the students. Learned Senior counsel has further referred to the report submitted under Section 173 Cr.P.C., wherein the prosecution has detailed the procedure of acquisition of Nepalese citizenship by descent; birth; naturalization; by honorary award and by acquisition of territory.
6. Learned Senior counsel has further referred to the investigation part qua petitioner No.2-Pavneet Singh, which is identical qua petitioners No.1 and 3 as well. The operative part of the report reads as under :-
'Pavneet Singh Investigation has revealed that Pavneet Singh is a bonafide citizen of India. He took admission in BE (Mechanical 1st year, PEC University of Technology, Chandigarh under DASA Scheme 2010-11 as Foreign National on the basis of fake and fictitious Nepalese Citizenship Certificate.
Investigation has revealed that Shri Amarjit Singh, father of accused Pavneet Singh received SMS regarding admission under nominated quota for MBBS, MBA, M.Tech. B.Tech in prestigious colleges, on his mobile phone from accused Mohinder Bajaj c/o Gera Labs, Hissar.
Shri Amarjeet Singh, contacted Dr. Mohinder Bajaj over phone, on which he told that he can manage admission for his son in any prestigious Engineering College like Delhi College of Engineering, Punjab Engineering College, NIT Jaipur, NIT Jalandhar, IIT Roorkie etc. on payment of advance Rs.2-3 lacs. Thereafter, in the first week of June, 2010, Pavneet Singh along with his mother and father went to the house of Dr. Mohinder Bajaj, who took them to Dr. Nishi Kant Arya. Accused Nishi Kant Arya demanded Rs.10 lacs for admission in any prestigious college, which was settled to Rs.9.5 lacs. Accused Pavneet Singh handed over his original educational certificates/documents to accused Dr. Nishi Kant Arya. Shri Amarjit Singh paid an advance amount of Rs.2 lacs to accused D
Kehar Singh & Ors. vs. State (Delhi Admn.)
Baldev Singh vs. State of Punjab
Dr. Vimla vs. Delhi Administration - AIR 1963 SC 1572
G. Sagar Suri vs. State of U.P. 2000 (2) SCC 636
Indian Oil Corporation vs. NEPC India Ltd. 2006 (6) SCC 736
Kehar Singh vs. State AIR 1988 SC 1883
Md. Ibrahim and Ors. vs. State of Bihar and Anr.
Mir Nagvi Askari vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
State (NCT of Delhi) vs. Navjot Sandhu @ Afsan Guru
A person can be held liable for forgery and cheating if they collude in the creation and use of a forged document, even if they are not the direct maker of that document.
The court emphasized that criminal proceedings cannot be initiated for civil disputes, and jurisdiction is essential for the validity of an FIR.
Forgery under Section 463 is complete upon the creation of a false document with the requisite fraudulent intent, regardless of actual loss or gain. Furthermore, an appellate court's power to impose ....
The court emphasized that criminal proceedings should not be misused for personal vendettas, requiring clear evidence of criminal intent for prosecution under IPC.
Criminal process cannot be utilized for any oblique purpose – Court should quash those criminal cases where chances of an ultimate conviction are bleak and no useful purpose is likely to be served by....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.