Back
ANOOP CHITKARA
Balwinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J.
FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
03 | 06.01.2018 | Shri Hargobindpur District Batala | 323, 324, 341, 148, 149 IPC and Section 307 IPC was added later on |
1. The petitioners arraigned as an accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on the compromise with the victims. The petitioners and the private respondents 2 to 4 are descendants of same parents, and cross-cases were registered against them.
2. The complainant Joginder Singh was the real brother of petitioner no. 1-Balwinder Singh. During the pendency of the matters, one of the victims Joginder Singh expired for causes not connected with the present FIR. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the injured have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition.
3. After that, the petitioners came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, the injured have been impleaded as respondent(s).
4. The injured respondent no. 3, Avinderjit Singh appeared before the court of JMIC Batala and for his identity, the copy of his AADHAR card was attested by JMIC on 6-
The court's decision established the principle that the inherent power under section 482 CrPC can be invoked to quash criminal proceedings based on a voluntary compromise and considering the societal....
The voluntary nature of settlement, absence of impact on public peace, and the reformatory nature of criminal jurisprudence justified the quashing of the FIR and all subsequent proceedings.
The main legal point established is that the voluntary settlement between the accused and the injured, the absence of impact on public peace, and the reformatory purpose of criminal jurisprudence jus....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court has the inherent power to quash criminal proceedings based on a compromise between the parties, especially in cases where the offenc....
The main legal point established is that the court can invoke its inherent jurisdiction under section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings based on a genuine compromise, even for non-compoundable o....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the absence of coercion in a compromise, the societal impact of the offences, and the reformatory purpose of criminal jurisprudence can justif....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is that the inherent power under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure can be invoked to quash criminal proceedings based on an amicable s....
The Court's decision was based on the principle that the inherent power of the High Court under Section 482 CrPC can be exercised to prevent abuse of the process of any court or to secure the ends of....
The court emphasized the reformatory purpose of criminal jurisprudence and the need to secure the ends of justice in exercising the inherent power for quashing the proceedings based on a compromise.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the court's invocation of its inherent power under section 482 CrPC to quash the FIR and all subsequent proceedings based on the compromise, consid....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
