ANOOP CHITKARA
Bhanu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J. - The petitioners, arraigned as accused in the above captioned FIR, have come up before this Court under Section 482 CrPC for quashing of the FIR and all consequential proceedings based on a compromise with the aggrieved person.
FIR No.
Dated
Police Station
Sections
217
15.3.2022
Sector 58, Faridabad
25 Arms Act and 147, 149, 307, 323, 341, 506 IPC
2. During the pendency of the petition, the accused and the aggrieved person have compromised the matter, and its copy is annexed with this petition as Annexure P-3.
3. After that, the petitioners came up before this Court to quash the FIR, and in the quashing petition, the aggrieved person has been impleaded as respondent.
4. On 16-07-2022, the aggrieved persons namely Prithi @ Prithvi Singh, Uma Shankar @ Ritu, Tek Chand @ Tinku, Dal Chand @ Dimpi, Keshav, Pradeep @ Nanu, Ombir @ Omkar, Mahender and Rahul appeared before the Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad and the remaining aggrieved persons namely Mahesh Kumar, Onkar Chauhan, Dhanraj, Amar Singh and Jai Prakash appeared before the Additional Sessions Judge, Faridabad on 21-07-2022 and stated that there would be no objection if the court quashes this FIR and conseq
State of M.P. v. Rajveer Singh
Dimpey Gujraj v Union Territory
Narinder Singh v. State of Punjab
Parbatbhai Aahir v State of Gujarat
Ram Prasad v State of Uttar Pradesh
Shakuntala Sawhney v Kaushalya Sawhney
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Dhruv Gurjar
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan & others
State of Maharashtra vs. Vikram Anantrai Doshi
State of Rajasthan v. Shambhu Kewat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.