Manoj Alias Annu vs State Of Haryana

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(P&H) 725

ANOOP CHITKARA
Manoj Alias Annu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates:
Mr. D.S. Matya, Advocate for the petitioner(s)., for the Appellant; Mr. Rajat Gautam, DAG, Haryana., for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

Anoop Chitkara, J. - The petitioner, incarcerating upon his arrest in the FIR captioned above, has come up before this Court under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail.

FIR No.	Dated	Police Station	Sections
176	19.7.2021	DLF Phase-III, Gurugram	147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 325, 326, 452 and 506 IPC

2. In paragraph 12 of the bail application, the accused declares the following criminal antecedents:

Sr. No.	FIR No.	Date	Offences	Police Station
1.	84	2021	61(i)(a) Excise Act	City Gurgram, District Gurugram
2.	222	2020	61(i)(a) Excise Act	City Gurgram, District Gurugram
3.	43	2020	307 IPC	City Gurgram, District Gurugram

3. On 18th July 2021, the petitioner along with his accomplices entered into the complainant's home, and the accused Ravi fired at him, however, he took refuge behind fridge, and after that the accused persons brutally thrashed his father.

4. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner contends

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(P&H) 725

ANOOP CHITKARAManoj Alias Annu – AppellantVersusState Of Haryana – Respondent

Cases Referred (8)

ANOOP CHITKARA
Manoj Alias Annu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent