Back
ANOOP CHITKARA
Surinder Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Punjab – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J.
FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
142 | 10.12.2021 | Chabbewal, District Hoshiarpur | 323, 324/34 IPC and later on added Sections 325, 326 IPC vide DDR No.26 dated 5.6.2022 and Section 307 IPC vide DDR No.31 dated 8.7.2022 |
1. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 438 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail.
2. In paragraph 8 of the bail application, the accused declares the following criminal antecedents:
Sr. No. | FIR No. | Date | Offences | Police Station |
1. | 59 | 15.5.2021 | 323, 354, 506, 34 IPC | Chabbwal, District Hoshiarpur |
3. The allegations are scuffle between two groups, leading to assaults and injuries.
4. Ld. Counsel for the petitioner contends that the custodial investigation would serve no purpose whatsoever, and the pre-trial incarceration would cause an irreversible injustice to the petitioner and family.
5. While opposing the bail, Ld. counsel representing the State contends that given the criminal past, the accused is likely to indulge in crime once released on bail.
REASONING:
6. In Maulana Mohd Amir Rashadi v. State of U.P., (2012) 3 SCC 382, Hon'ble Supreme Court holds,
[10] It is not in dispute and highlighted that th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
