Back
ANOOP CHITKARA
Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J.
FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
106 | 26.02.2022 | City Rewari, District Rewari | 147, 149, 323, 379-B, 427 and 506 of IPC |
1. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 438 Cr.P.C seeking anticipatory bail.
2. In paragraph 7 of the bail application, the accused declares that he has no criminal history. However, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner states that it was due to some communication error, and in fact there were cases pending against him, and it was a bonafide mistake. Be that as it may, as per the status report in para 7, the accused has following criminal antecedents:
Sr. No. | FIR No. | Date | Offences | Police Station |
1. | 37 (acquitted) | 28.01.2015 | 294/506 IPC | Civil Lines, Bhiwani |
2. | 76 (quashed) | 08.04.2016 | 323, 452, 506, 34 IPC | Farukhnagar, Gurugram |
3. | 234 (under trial) | 22.05.2017 | 302, 120-B, 34 IPC and 25, 54, 59 of Arms Act | Sadar, Charkhi Dadri |
4. | 586 (under trial) | 07.09.2018 | 174-A IPC | Sadar, Charkhi Dadri |
5. | 417 (convicted) | 02.11.2013 | 13, 3, 67 of Gambling Act | City Charkhi Dadri |
6. | 231 (acquitted) | 20.12.2004 | 323, 506, 452 IPC | City Charkhi Dadri |
7. | 188 (acquitted) | 04.11.1999 | 323, 452, 506 | City Charkhi Dadri |
3. The accused along with 15-16 members of hi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
