ANOOP CHITKARA
Vinod Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Anoop Chitkara, J.
FIR No. | Dated | Police Station | Sections |
106 | 26.02.2022 | City Rewari, District Rewari | 147, 149, 323, 379-B, 427 and 506 of IPC |
1. The petitioner apprehending arrest in the FIR captioned above has come up before this Court under Section 438 Cr.P.C seeking anticipatory bail.
2. In paragraph 7 of the bail application, the accused declares that he has no criminal history. However, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner states that it was due to some communication error, and in fact there were cases pending against him, and it was a bonafide mistake. Be that as it may, as per the status report in para 7, the accused has following criminal antecedents:
Sr. No. | FIR No. | Date | Offences | Police Station |
1. | 37 (acquitted) | 28.01.2015 | 294/506 IPC | Civil Lines, Bhiwani |
2. | 76 (quashed) | 08.04.2016 | 323, 452, 506, 34 IPC | Farukhnagar, Gurugram |
3. | 234 (under trial) | 22.05.2017 | 302, 120-B, 34 IPC and 25, 54, 59 of Arms Act | Sadar, Charkhi Dadri |
4. | 586 (under trial) | 07.09.2018 | 174-A IPC | Sadar, Charkhi Dadri |
5. | 417 (convicted) | 02.11.2013 | 13, 3, 67 of Gambling Act | City Charkhi Dadri |
6. | 231 (acquitted) | 20.12.2004 | 323, 506, 452 IPC | City Charkhi Dadri |
7. | 188 (acquitted) | 04.11.1999 | 323, 452, 506 | City Charkhi Dadri |
3. The accused along with 15-16 members of hi
Dataram Singh v State of Uttar Pradesh
Gudikanti Narasimhulu v Public Prosecutor
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia v State of Punjab
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav
Maulana Mohd Amir Rashadi vs. State of U.P.
The court may grant anticipatory bail with stringent conditions to prevent the accused from influencing the investigation, tampering with evidence, or intimidating witnesses, considering the nature o....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for judicious consideration of criminal history and the imposition of stringent conditions to address concerns related to influencing the ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the need for the court to act judiciously with reasonableness when considering bail for an accused with a criminal history, and the imposition of s....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the discretion of the court in granting bail, the need for judicious consideration of bail petitions, and the imposition of stringent conditions to....
The grant of bail must consider the cumulative effect of various circumstances justifying the grant or refusal of bail, and stringent conditions can be imposed to prevent influencing the investigatio....
The duty of the Court to find out the role of the accused, the onerous responsibility of the Courts to act judiciously with reasonableness, and the cumulative effect of the variety of circumstances j....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of judiciously considering various circumstances and legal provisions related to bail in granting bail to an accused with a criminal....
The court may grant bail with stringent conditions, considering the period of incarceration, criminal antecedents, and legal provisions related to bail decisions from previous cases.
The court can grant bail with stringent conditions, taking into account the individual's rights and the need for an uninterrupted police investigation.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.