Back
HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Bharat Shiv Rattan – Appellant
Versus
State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Harnaresh Singh Gill , J. (Oral) - Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing.
2. Through this petition, the petitioner seeks regular bail in case bearing FIR No.88 dated 02.02.2019, registered under Sections 148, 149, 323, 365, 379-B and 506 IPC (Section 201 IPC added later on) and Section 25 of the Arms Act, at Police Station City Narnaul, District Mahendergarh, Haryana.
3. The status report by way of affidavit dated 22.01.2022 of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Narnaul, District Mahendergarh, already filed in the Registry, is taken on record.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case by the police with ulterior motive; that no specific injury has been attributed to the petitioner; that no recovery was effected from the petitioner; that there is a delay of three days in lodging the FIR; that four other co-accused are on bail and that the petitioner has been in custody since 13.04.2021.
5. He further submits that there are two MLRs in the present case; that as per the first MLR, which was of a Government Hospital, there was only one injury on the person of the victim, but as per the secon
The court considered the prolonged custody period, delay in trial, and the bail status of co-accused as grounds for granting regular bail to the petitioner.
The decision to grant bail was based on the nature of injuries, the status of the co-accused, and the prolonged trial process.
The decision to grant regular bail was based on the prolonged custody period, lack of other pending cases, and the commencement of prosecution evidence.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the grant of regular bail should be considered in light of the time it would take for the trial to conclude and the circumstances of the co....
The court considered the prolonged custody, lack of specific allegations, and delay in trial due to the Covid-19 pandemic as grounds for granting bail.
The court considered the lack of serious injury to the complainant, the petitioner not being named in the FIR, and the petitioner's prolonged detention without serving any useful purpose as grounds f....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
