RAVI SHANKER JHA, ARUN PALLI
Sweety Nagar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ravi Shanker Jha, C.J. (Oral) - This appeal has been filed by the appellant, under Clause X of the Letters Patent Act, being aggrieved by an order dated 07.01.2022, passed by the learned Single Judge in CWP-25698-2021.
2. The brief facts leading to filing of the appeal are that the appellant applied for appointment pursuant to an advertisement issued by the Haryana Staff Selection Commission, Panchkula, dated 05.07.2019. Admittedly and undisputedly, the appellant applied for the post of LDC under category No.26 in General Category. At the time of selection and scrutiny of documents, the appellant sought to change her category from General to BC-B and for consideration of a claim against the post reserved for BC-B category. The respondent-authorities vide order dated 13.07.2021 rejected the claim of the appellant being aggrieved by which the appellant filed CWP-25698-2021 which has been dismissed by the learned Single Judge vide the impugned order.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the mistake committed by the appellant was bona fide and that she sought correction of the same before completion of the selection process during scrutiny of documents, in such circu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.