SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(P&H) 2212

SUVIR SEHGAL
Harish Kumar Alias Harish Bakshi – Appellant
Versus
Geetanjli Sharma – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner

JUDGMENT

Suvir Sehgal, J. (Oral) - Instant revision petition has been filed under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'the Code') challenging the order dated 21.02.2022 passed in complaint No.67/2019 by learned JMIC, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, vide which the petitioner has been directed to pay monthly interim maintenance of Rs.10,000/- to the respondent in proceedings under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (for short 'the DV Act') and the order dated 30.03.2022 passed in CRA-52-2022 by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yamuna Nagar at Jagadhri, vide which the appeal of the petitioner against the said order has been dismissed.

2. In brief, facts leading to the filing of the present petition are that the complainant-aggrieved person (hereinafter referred to as 'respondent No.1') has filed a complaint under Section 12 of the D.V. Act averring that she was married to the petitioner on 08.02.2017 and huge amount was spent on the marriage functions and sufficient dowry was given to the petitioner as well as his relations as per the financial capacity and status of the parties. But from the very beginning, the petitioner and h

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top