SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 968

LISA GILL, RITU TAGORE
Hari Chand – Appellant
Versus
Nitu Bala – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Inderjit Sharma, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Narinder Kumar Vadhera, Advocate for the respondent.

LISA GILL, J.

1. This appeal has been filed by the appellant-husband challenging judgment dated 01.12.2014, passed by learned District Judge, Gurdaspur, whereby husband's petition under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short the Act), has been dismissed.

2. Marriage between the parties had been solemnized on 20.01.1999. A child was born out of this wed-lock in September, 2003 but he unfortunately did not survive the delivery. Due to differences arising between the parties, petition under Section 13 of the Act was filed by the appellant-husband, which was dismissed vide impugned judgment dated 01.12.2014, passed by the learned District Judge, Gurdaspur.

3. It is stated that during pendency of this appeal, the matter has been amicably resolved between the parties. They have decided to part ways with the appellant depositing a sum of ?12,65,000/- with the respondent-wife as full and final settlement of all her claims - past, present and future including permanent alimony, maintenance etc.

4. Application seeking conversion of petition under Section 13 to one under Section 13-B of the Act was allowed by the Co-ordinate Bench on 29.11.2022. Statements of the parties at first m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top