SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1051

SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI
Mani Ram Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Aman Redhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.

1. The petitioner herein instituted a petition under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, before the learned Collector concerned. The petition (supra) became assigned case No.87 V.C.L., and, thereon an eviction order was passed on 24.07.2014. Subsequently, the petitioner filed an application, as carried in Annexure P-2, for executing the eviction order (supra), as became passed by the learned Assistant Collector concerned. The application (supra) for execution, yet remains unenforced rather at the instance of the learned Assistant Collector. Therefore, the petitioner is driven to access this Court, for a mandamus being made, upon, the learned Assistant Collector concerned, to ensure that a lawful order is passed on the execution application, as carried in Annexure P-2.

2. If, as a matter of fact, the eviction order, as carried in Annexure P-1, has acquired a binding, and, a conclusive effect, inasmuch as, it remaining unappealed, before the learned competent appellate authority concerned, thereupon alone Annexure P-1 is required to be ensured to be forthwith fully executed by the learned Assistant Collector concerned. However, if A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top