SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1051

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sureshwar Thakur, Kuldeep Tiwari, JJ.
Mani Ram Sharma - Petitioner - Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana and others - Respondents - Respondent
CWP-7731 of 2023
Decided On : 17-04-2023

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Aman Redhu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Raman Sharma, Addl. A.G., Haryana.

Necessity for awaiting a final decision by the competent appellate authority before executing an eviction order.

Headnote:

Eviction Order - Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961 - The court discussed the binding and conclusive effect of an eviction order and the necessity for awaiting a final decision by the competent appellate authority before executing the order.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a petition for executing an eviction order passed by the Assistant Collector. The petitioner sought a mandamus to ensure a lawful order is passed on the execution application.

Finding of the Court:

The court closed the writ petition, emphasizing the need for the Assistant Collector to await a final decision by the competent appellate authority before drawing any lawful order upon the execution application.

Issues: Interpretation of the binding and conclusive effect of an eviction order, necessity for awaiting a final decision by the competent appellate authority before executing the order.

Ratio Decidendi: The necessity for awaiting a final decision by the competent appellate authority before executing an eviction order.

Final Decision: The writ petition is closed and disposed of accordingly.

SURESHWAR THAKUR, J.

1. The petitioner herein instituted a petition under Section 7 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, before the learned Collector concerned. The petition (supra) became assigned case No.87 V.C.L., and, thereon an eviction order was passed on 24.07.2014. Subsequently, the petitioner filed an application, as carried in Annexure P-2, for executing the eviction order (supra), as became passed by the learned Assistant Collector concerned. The application (supra) for execution, yet remains unenforced rather at the instance of the learned Assistant Collector. Therefore, the petitioner is driven to access this Court, for a mandamus being made, upon, the learned Assistant Collector concerned, to ensure that a lawful order is passed on the execution application, as carried in Annexure P-2.

2. If, as a matter of fact, the eviction order, as carried in Annexure P-1, has acquired a binding, and, a conclusive effect, inasmuch as, it remaining unappealed, before the learned competent appellate authority concerned, thereupon alone Annexure P-1 is required to be ensured to be forthwith fully executed by the learned Assistant Collector concerned. However, if Annexure P-1 has yet not acquired any binding, and, a conclusive effect, inasmuch as, the aggrieved therefrom rearing an appeal thereagainst, before the competent appellate authority concerned, thereupon the learned Assistant Collector concerned, may not draw any lawful order upon Annexure P-2, but may await a final, and, a conclusive decision being made thereon, by the competent appellate authority concerned.

3. With the above made observations, the instant writ petition, is closed, and, is disposed of accordingly.

Order accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top