SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 766

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURESHWAR THAKUR, LALIT BATRA, JJ.
Satpal – Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & Ors. – Respondents
CWP NO. 26306 of 2023
Decided On : 26-02-2024

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ram Bhati, Advocate for Mr. Naresh Kumar, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Mr. Ankur Mittal, Additional Advocate General, Haryana with Mr. Saurabh Mago, Deputy Advocate General, Haryana.

Eviction orders under the Punjab Village Common Lands Act cannot be enforced until they attain finality, especially when a statutory appeal is pending.

Headnote:(A) Punjab Village Common Lands Act, 1961 - Section 7(2) - Eviction petition instituted by Gram Panchayat against individuals - The eviction order was decreed, but enforcement was contingent upon the finality of the eviction verdict. The court directed the Sarpanch to file an execution petition only if the eviction order was binding. (Paras 2, 4, 6, 8, 10)

(B) Appeal - The court emphasized that the eviction order did not acquire binding effect due to an ongoing statutory appeal, necessitating a stay application before the Appellate Authority. (Paras 7, 9, 10)

Facts of the case:
The eviction petition was filed by the Gram Panchayat against individuals for land use rights, leading to a decree on 18.10.2021. A subsequent writ petition sought enforcement of the eviction order.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the eviction order could not be enforced until it attained finality, and the aggrieved parties had the right to appeal.

Issues: The main issues were the enforceability of the eviction order in light of an ongoing appeal and the procedural requirements for enforcement.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the eviction order's enforcement was contingent on its finality and that the aggrieved parties must seek a stay from the Appellate Authority.

Result: The operation of the impugned warrants of possession was stayed, subject to the filing of a stay application.

JUDGMENT

Mr. Sureshwar Thakur, J. - (Oral)

The eviction petition bearing No.11/VCL dated 11.06.2019 (Annexure P-2) became instituted against one Satpal and one Narender at the instance of Gram Panchayat of village Brah Khurd, Tehsil and District Jind. On the said eviction petition, an order became rendered on 18.10.2021, whereby the eviction petition (supra), preferred by the Gram Panchayat concerned, became decreed.

2. The said petition was constituted under the provisions of Section 7 (2) of the Punjab Village Common Lands Act, 1961 (hereinafter in short referred to as the Act of 1961).

3. Earlier to the instant writ petition becoming instituted before this Court, a person who was interested in the disputed land, given his being assigned the rights of common user there of, in the consolidation scheme, thus, instituted Civil Writ Petition bearing No.19996 of 2023, for thereby this Court, making a direction upon the decree holder concerned, to forthwith institute an execution petition, for therebys enforcing the verdict of eviction.

4. In the operative part of the order made on the said petition on 12.09.2023, operative part whereof become extracted hereinafter, it was directed that the Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat concerned, only if the verdict of eviction has acquired finality binding and conclusive effects, thus forthwith instituting an execution petition before the learned Assistant Collector concerned.

    "In consequence, the present petition is disposed of, but with a direction, upon, the Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat concerned to, in case Annexure P-1 has attained binding and conclusive effect, thus forthwith institute an execution petition before the learned Assistant Collector concerned, for enforcing Annexure P1, who shall thereafter, in accordance with law, make a lawful expeditious decision thereon, but after hearing all the affected persons concerned."

5. It appears that the impugned order of eviction has been passed in terms of the above extracted operative portion of the order, as occurs in a decision made on the petition (supra), on 12.09.2023.

6. Be that as it may, an incisive reading of the said operative part discloses that until and unless the verdict of eviction passed against the judgment debtors concerned, thus acquires finality conclusivity, thereupon alone the verdict of eviction is required to be completely and successfully enforced against the judgment debtors concerned.

7. However, it appears that on the date when the said orders were passed by this Court, there was no intimation with the learned Additional Advocate General, that a statutory appeal (Annexure P-5) has been raised there against at the instance of the aggrieved from the verdict of eviction, passed by the learned Assistant Collector concerned.

8. Necessarily thereby, the verdict of eviction did not, thus, acquire binding and conclusive effect nor in terms of the operative part as carried in the judgment drawn by this Court on the writ petition (supra), thus, the verdict of eviction was amenable for becoming completely and successfully enforced against the judgment debtors concerned.

9. Nonetheless, it appears that for want of any stay being granted against the verdict of eviction passed by the Assistant Collector concerned and which led the aggrieved therefrom to prefer Annexure P-5, before the Appellate Authority concerned, that thereby the learned Assistant Collector concerned, while functioning as an Executing Court, thus, has proceeded to draw the impugned warrants of possession against the judgment debtors concerned. Though the said drawing of warrants of possession is required to be undone through this Court, rather restraining their successful efficacious execution against the judgment debtors concerned, but since the remedy of appeal has been accessed by the aggrieved judgment debtors, before the Appellate Authority concerned. Therefore, even if no stay has been granted by the Appellate Authority concerned on the relevant applicati

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top