IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
SURESHWAR THAKUR, LALIT BATRA, JJ.
Satpal – Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana & Ors. – Respondents
CWP NO. 26306 of 2023
Decided On : 26-02-2024
JUDGMENT
Mr. Sureshwar Thakur, J. - (Oral)
The eviction petition bearing No.11/VCL dated 11.06.2019 (Annexure P-2) became instituted against one Satpal and one Narender at the instance of Gram Panchayat of village Brah Khurd, Tehsil and District Jind. On the said eviction petition, an order became rendered on 18.10.2021, whereby the eviction petition (supra), preferred by the Gram Panchayat concerned, became decreed.
2. The said petition was constituted under the provisions of Section 7 (2) of the Punjab Village Common Lands Act, 1961 (hereinafter in short referred to as the Act of 1961).
3. Earlier to the instant writ petition becoming instituted before this Court, a person who was interested in the disputed land, given his being assigned the rights of common user there of, in the consolidation scheme, thus, instituted Civil Writ Petition bearing No.19996 of 2023, for thereby this Court, making a direction upon the decree holder concerned, to forthwith institute an execution petition, for therebys enforcing the verdict of eviction.
4. In the operative part of the order made on the said petition on 12.09.2023, operative part whereof become extracted hereinafter, it was directed that the Sarpanch of the Gram Panchayat concerned, only if the verdict of eviction has acquired finality binding and conclusive effects, thus forthwith instituting an execution petition before the learned Assistant Collector concerned.
5. It appears that the impugned order of eviction has been passed in terms of the above extracted operative portion of the order, as occurs in a decision made on the petition (supra), on 12.09.2023.
6. Be that as it may, an incisive reading of the said operative part discloses that until and unless the verdict of eviction passed against the judgment debtors concerned, thus acquires finality conclusivity, thereupon alone the verdict of eviction is required to be completely and successfully enforced against the judgment debtors concerned.
7. However, it appears that on the date when the said orders were passed by this Court, there was no intimation with the learned Additional Advocate General, that a statutory appeal (Annexure P-5) has been raised there against at the instance of the aggrieved from the verdict of eviction, passed by the learned Assistant Collector concerned.
8. Necessarily thereby, the verdict of eviction did not, thus, acquire binding and conclusive effect nor in terms of the operative part as carried in the judgment drawn by this Court on the writ petition (supra), thus, the verdict of eviction was amenable for becoming completely and successfully enforced against the judgment debtors concerned.
9. Nonetheless, it appears that for want of any stay being granted against the verdict of eviction passed by the Assistant Collector concerned and which led the aggrieved therefrom to prefer Annexure P-5, before the Appellate Authority concerned, that thereby the learned Assistant Collector concerned, while functioning as an Executing Court, thus, has proceeded to draw the impugned warrants of possession against the judgment debtors concerned. Though the said drawing of warrants of possession is required to be undone through this Court, rather restraining their successful efficacious execution against the judgment debtors concerned, but since the remedy of appeal has been accessed by the aggrieved judgment debtors, before the Appellate Authority concerned. Therefore, even if no stay has been granted by the Appellate Authority concerned on the relevant applicati
Eviction orders under the Punjab Village Common Lands Act cannot be enforced until they attain finality, especially when a statutory appeal is pending.
The court affirmed the binding nature of eviction orders under the Punjab Village Common Lands Act, rejecting jurisdictional challenges based on the Haryana Public Premises Act.
The court ruled that an eviction petition under the Punjab Village Common Lands Act must be converted into a title suit for valid jurisdiction, invalidating subsequent orders if not.
The eviction process under the Haryana Village Common Land Act requires substantiation with relevant documents; mere claims of disputed title without evidence are insufficient.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.