Back
NAMIT KUMAR
Mohini Punani (Smt. ) (now deceased) through her LRs – Appellant
Versus
Sham Lal Chopra (now deceased) through his LRs – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the suit filed and associated agreements. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. legal arguments regarding limitation and applicability of order 7 rule 11. (Para 4 , 10) |
| 3. judicial observations on necessity of trials for deciding limitation issues. (Para 5 , 12) |
| 4. the criteria under order 7 rule 11 cpc regarding cause of action. (Para 6 , 9) |
Judgment
Mr. Namit Kumar, J.
Instant revision petition has been filed by the petitioners/defendants impugning the order dated 21.05.2016 passed by the Court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Panipat, whereby their application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, has been dismissed.
2. Brief facts relevant for the disposal of the present revision petition are that respondents/plaintiffs filed a suit for mandatory injunction directing the defendants to disclose the name of collaborators/vendee and further the present market price fixed/to be fixed of the 14 shops in question (in ratio of entire building) situated at basement of Seema Cinema, Panipat, and also disclose all the terms and conditions settled/to be settled by the defendants with the said collaborators/vendee in compliance to agreement dated 17.07.1997, 11.08.2001, 04.02.2006, 1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
