Back
GURBIR SINGH
Parvati Devi – Appellant
Versus
Karam Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's claim based on possession without ownership documents. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding established possession and legal compliance. (Para 4) |
| 3. burden of proof and clean hands in legal claims. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. final dismissal of the appeal and pending applications. (Para 7 , 8) |
Judgment
Mr. Gurbir Singh, J.:- C.M.No.4026-C of 2020
This application has been filed under Section 5 of the LIMITATION ACT , 1963, for condoning the delay of 26 days in filing the present appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay of 26 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
R.S.A. No.1394 of 2020
1. The plaintiff-appellant (hereinafter referred to as ‘the plaintiff’) has filed this appeal against the concurrent findings of the Courts below. Plaintiff filed the suit against the defendants-respondents (hereinafter called the ‘defendants’) for grant of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from dispossessing and interfering in peaceful possession of the plaintiff over the suit property in any manner. As per version of the plaintiff, she has been residing in the suit property for the last 30 years. The electricity connection has
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
