Judgment

Mr. Anil Kshetarpal, J.

This is the plaintiffs’ revision petition to challenge the correctness of the two impugned orders passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana on 20.11.2015. Vide Annexure P17, the trial Court has dismissed as many as four applications filed by the plaintiffs, two filed under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”), whereas two under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC. Through the second order, the civil suit filed by the plaintiffs has been dismissed on the ground that the same has become infructuous.

2. In order to comprehend the issue involved in the present case, the relevant facts, in brief, are required to be noticed. The petitioners, namely Daljit Kaur and Gursharan Kaur, mother and daughter, filed a suit against Bhupinder Singh for the grant of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering into their possession with respect to the plot comprised in khasra No. 186 (min) with two rooms and a staircase. The plaintiffs claimed that they purchased the aforesaid property, measuring 527 square yards in total, through two different registered sale deeds, one executed by Gurmeet Singh, wherea