SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 346

ANIL KSHETARPAL
Daljit Singh (since deceased) through his LRs – Appellant
Versus
Mohinder Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Dr. Dayal Partap Singh Randhawa, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

1. The first appellate court has set aside the ex-parte decree and ordered decision of the suit afresh. The correctness of the aforesaid order has been challenged in this revision petition.

2. It has been found that the defendants(respondents herein) were not properly served with the notices of the suit. On appreciation of the record, the first appellate court has recorded the following findings:-

    “16. After giving anxious thoughts to the rival contentions and going through the record of the case, this Court is of the considered view that findings of the learned trial court on issues no.1 and 3 cannot sustain. Perusal of the record of the main case shows that after institution of the suit, the learned trial Court passed the order dated 27.08.2011 for service of the defendants through ordinary process and registered post for 28.10.2011. However, Ahlmad failed to issue the summons for 28.10.2011 and 23.01.2012. On 22.02.2012, Shri Satinder Pal Singh, Advocate appeared on behalf of defendants no.1,2, 4 to 17. However, the order is silent with regard to issuance of any summons for the said date to the remaining defendants. Summons for the next date i.e. 10.04

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top