SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 556

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, N.S. SHEKHAWAT, JJ.
State of Punjab - Appellant
Versus
Lakha Singh & Anr. - Respondents
CRA-D. No. 966-DBA of 2002
Decided On : 20-05-2024

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. I.P.S. Sabharwal DAG, Punjab.
For the Respondent:Mr. K.S. Kahlon Advocate, Mr. D.S. Pheruman.

IMPORTANT POINT
The judgment emphasizes the necessity of individual examination of accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. to ensure fair trial rights, and procedural defects can lead to acquittal if they cause prejudice.

Headnote:

Criminal - IPC - Sections 324, 326, 307 - The court analyzed the provisions of IPC Sections 324 and 326 regarding grievous and simple injuries, and the necessity of individual examination under Section 313 Cr.P.C., leading to the acquittal of the accused due to procedural defects.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved two appeals concerning the conviction of two accused for causing injuries to a complainant during a dispute over land access. The trial court convicted them under IPC Sections 324 and 326 but acquitted them of attempted murder under Section 307.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that while there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction under Sections 324 and 326 IPC, the trial court's joint examination of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. was improper, leading to the conclusion that the accused were prejudiced.

Issues: The main issues were whether the trial court's joint examination of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. constituted a procedural defect and whether the evidence supported a conviction under Section 307 IPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the joint examination of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. was a significant procedural defect that prejudiced the accused's ability to defend themselves, warranting their acquittal.

Result: The appeals were accepted, and the accused were acquitted of all charges.

JUDGMENT :

Mr. Gurvinder Singh Gill, J.

This order shall dispose off the aforesaid two appeals arising out of judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 26.08.2002 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Ad hoc), Amritsar rendered in a trial arising out of FIR No.11 dated 25.01.1997 registered at P.S. Goindwal Sahib, under Sections 307/324 IPC, whereby accused/appellants, namely, Lakha Singh and Swaran Singh have been convicted and sentenced as under :

Name of convict

Under Section

Rigorous Imprisonment

Fine

In default

Lakha Singh

326 IPC

Three years

Rs.2000/-

Two months RI

Lakha Singh

324/34 IPC

One year

Swaran Singh

326/34 IPC

Three years

Rs.2000/-

Two months RI

Swaran Singh

324 IPC

One year

2. While CRA-D-966-DBA-2002 has been filed by the State of Punjab challenging the acquittal of the accused (Lakha singh and Swaran Singh) with respect to offence under Section 307 IPC, CRA-S-1521-SB-2002 has been preferred by accused/appellants Lakha Singh and Swaran Singh challenging their conviction for offences under Sections 324 & 326 IPC as recorded by the trial Court.

3. The FIR in question was lodged on the basis of statement of Gurmej Singh recorded on 25.01.1997. The translated gist of the FIR reads as under :

    “I am resident of village Dhunda and I am into cultivation. About 5 months back, my elder brother Nachhattar Singh purchased land measuring 10 marlas outside the village, adjoining the behak of Lakha Singh. I and my brother used to store cow-dung cakes and firewood in the said land and also used tether our cattle there during day time. Lakha Singh, however, on 24.01.1997 closed the passage leading to said land from the side of the village by placing dry branches of trees. Yesterday i.e. on 24.01.1997 at about 3.00 PM, I and my brother went to the said land to fetch firewood and when we were untying our cattle and picking up firewood, then Lakha Singh armed with a Takua and Swaran Singh armed with a Gandassi came there while raising lalkaras that they will teach us a lesson for removing the branches of trees from the passage. I stepped forward and told Lakha Singh not to quarrel and that the matter can be resolved by sitting together, but they did not pay any heed and Lakha Singh gave a Takua blow hitting my head. Swaran Singh also gave a blow with Gandassi to me. I raised my left arm to ward off the blow, which hit me on the bicep of my left arm. My brother raised alarm ‘mar ditta – mar ditta’ upon which accused fled away from the spot alongwith their weapons. After making arrangement for a conveyance, I was removed to Guru Nanak Hospital, where Doctors medically examined me and applied bandages. Lakha Singh and Swaran Singh, in connivance with each other, had inflicted injuries to me.”

4. Pursuant to lodging of FIR, the Police visited the place of occurrence and prepared rough site plan of the place of occurrence. Accused Lakha Singh was arrested on 19.02.1997. During the course of interrogation, he suffered a disclosure statement (Ex.PF) on 21.02.1997 to the effect that he had kept concealed ‘Takua’ under the heap of Toria (mustard) crop. Pursuant to said disclosure statement, Lakha Singh led the police party to the nominated place and got Takua recovered, which was taken into possession vide memo Ex.PG.

5. Upon conclusion of investigation, since Swaran Singh was found innocent, challan was presented only against Lakha Singh in the Court of Illaqa Magistrate, who committed the case to the Court of Sessions on 05.06.1997, where charges were framed against accused Lakha Singh for offence punishable under Section 307 IPC on 11.07.1997 to which he pleaded not guilty and

                                  Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                  1
                                  2
                                  3
                                  4
                                  5
                                  6
                                  7
                                  8
                                  9
                                  10
                                  11
                                  SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                  supreme today icon
                                  logo-black

                                  An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                  Please visit our Training & Support
                                  Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                  qr

                                  Scan Me!

                                  India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                  For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                  whatsapp-icon Back to top