IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
GURVINDER SINGH GILL, N.S. SHEKHAWAT, JJ.
State of Punjab - Appellant
Versus
Lakha Singh & Anr. - Respondents
CRA-D. No. 966-DBA of 2002
Decided On : 20-05-2024
Criminal - IPC - Sections 324, 326, 307 - The court analyzed the provisions of IPC Sections 324 and 326 regarding grievous and simple injuries, and the necessity of individual examination under Section 313 Cr.P.C., leading to the acquittal of the accused due to procedural defects.
Fact of the Case:
The case involved two appeals concerning the conviction of two accused for causing injuries to a complainant during a dispute over land access. The trial court convicted them under IPC Sections 324 and 326 but acquitted them of attempted murder under Section 307.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that while there was sufficient evidence to support the conviction under Sections 324 and 326 IPC, the trial court's joint examination of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. was improper, leading to the conclusion that the accused were prejudiced.
Issues: The main issues were whether the trial court's joint examination of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. constituted a procedural defect and whether the evidence supported a conviction under Section 307 IPC.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the joint examination of the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. was a significant procedural defect that prejudiced the accused's ability to defend themselves, warranting their acquittal.
Result: The appeals were accepted, and the accused were acquitted of all charges.
JUDGMENT :
Mr. Gurvinder Singh Gill, J.
This order shall dispose off the aforesaid two appeals arising out of judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 26.08.2002 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge (Ad hoc), Amritsar rendered in a trial arising out of FIR No.11 dated 25.01.1997 registered at P.S. Goindwal Sahib, under Sections 307/324 IPC, whereby accused/appellants, namely, Lakha Singh and Swaran Singh have been convicted and sentenced as under :
| Name of convict | Under Section | Rigorous Imprisonment | Fine | In default | |
| Lakha Singh | 326 IPC | Three years | Rs.2000/- | Two months RI | |
| Lakha Singh | 324/34 IPC | One year | — | — | |
| Swaran Singh | 326/34 IPC | Three years | Rs.2000/- | Two months RI | |
| Swaran Singh | 324 IPC | One year | — | — |
2. While CRA-D-966-DBA-2002 has been filed by the State of Punjab challenging the acquittal of the accused (Lakha singh and Swaran Singh) with respect to offence under Section 307 IPC, CRA-S-1521-SB-2002 has been preferred by accused/appellants Lakha Singh and Swaran Singh challenging their conviction for offences under Sections 324 & 326 IPC as recorded by the trial Court.
3. The FIR in question was lodged on the basis of statement of Gurmej Singh recorded on 25.01.1997. The translated gist of the FIR reads as under :
4. Pursuant to lodging of FIR, the Police visited the place of occurrence and prepared rough site plan of the place of occurrence. Accused Lakha Singh was arrested on 19.02.1997. During the course of interrogation, he suffered a disclosure statement (Ex.PF) on 21.02.1997 to the effect that he had kept concealed ‘Takua’ under the heap of Toria (mustard) crop. Pursuant to said disclosure statement, Lakha Singh led the police party to the nominated place and got Takua recovered, which was taken into possession vide memo Ex.PG.
5. Upon conclusion of investigation, since Swaran Singh was found innocent, challan was presented only against Lakha Singh in the Court of Illaqa Magistrate, who committed the case to the Court of Sessions on 05.06.1997, where charges were framed against accused Lakha Singh for offence punishable under Section 307 IPC on 11.07.1997 to which he pleaded not guilty and
Parminder Kaur v. State of Punjab
Nar Singh Vs. State of Haryana
Hate Singh Bhagat Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
State of Maharashtra Vs. Sukhdev Singh
Naval Kishore Singh Vs. State of Bihar
Sanatan Naskar & Another Vs. State of West Bengal
Premchand Vs. State of Maharashtra
Ajmer Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade Vs. State of Maharashtra
Paramjeet Singh @ Pamma Vs. State of Uttarakhand
Harnam Singh Vs. State (Delhi Admn)
Ganeshmal Jashraj Vs. Government of Gujarat & Anr.
State (N.C.T. of Delhi) Vs. Navjot Sandhu @ Afsan Guru
State of Rajasthan Vs. Parmanand
The judgment emphasizes the necessity of individual examination of accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C. to ensure fair trial rights, and procedural defects can lead to acquittal if they cause prejudice.
The mandatory provision of Section 313 CrPC aims to afford the accused an opportunity to explain each and every circumstance and incriminating evidence against them, and failure to comply with this p....
Where there is perfunctory examination under Section 313 Cr.P.C., matter is capable of being remitted to trial court from the stage at which prosecution was closed.
(1) Court must ordinarily eschew material circumstances not put to accused from consideration while dealing with case of particular accused.(2) Examination of accused – Court is empowered to take hel....
Whenever a plea of non-compliance with Section 313 Cr.P.C. is raised, it is within powers of appellate court to examine and further examine the convict or counsel appearing for accused and the said a....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of properly examining the accused under Section 313 of the CrPC to allow them to explain any circumstances appearing in the evidence....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.