SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2540

ALKA SARIN
Gauri Shankar Alias Gopi (Deceased) – Appellant
Versus
Gautam Parkash (Deceased) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Ravish Bansal, Advocate; For the Petitioners

JUDGMENT

Alka Sarin, J.

The present revision petition has been preferred by the tenants against the orders passed by both the Authorities below returning concurrent findings of fact and ordering their ejectment.

2. Brief facts relevant to the present lis are that the landlord-respondent No.1 filed an ejectment petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Punjab Rent Act') for eviction of the present petitioner and the proforma respondents from the shop bearing Municipal property/shop No.IX/1048 averring that the shop in dispute is in the ownership of landlord-respondent No.1 since 30.03.1994 and it fell to the share of the landlord-respondent No.1 in a family partition, which was upheld by the Court of Sh.Varinder Aggrawal, the then Civil Judge (Junior Division), Moga vide judgment and decree dated 17.05.1997 passed in case No.831 of 12/1995. It was further averred that originally the shop in dispute was owned by Charanjit Rai and Sons i.e. family concern or the HUF concern of the family of the landlord-respondent No.1 and the shop in dispute alongwith adjoining shops bearing Municipal property/shops No.IX/1047 and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top