SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2488

ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL
Kapoor Singh – Appellant
Versus
Jang Bahadur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ms. Himani Kapila, Advocate; For the Petitioner
Mr. Dheeraj Mahajan, Advocate; For the Respondent

Headnote: Read headnote

JUDGMENT

Mr. Anupinder Singh Grewal, J. (Oral)

The petitioner has challenged the judgments dated 20.05.2019 and 22.03.2023 whereby the Rent Controller has allowed the rent petition preferred by the respondent/landlord for eviction from demised premises on account of bona fide necessity and the appeal filed there against by the petitioner/tenant has been dismissed by the Appellate Authority.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition for eviction has been erroneously allowed although the respondent/landlord could not make out a case for bona fide necessity.

3. Issue notice to the respondent. Mr. Dheeraj Mahajan, Advocate, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top