Tilak Raj vs State of Haryana - 2023 Supreme(P&H) 1991

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(P&H) 1991

HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Tilak Raj – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sourabh Kandoi, Advocate for Mr. Balkar Singh, Advocate; For the Petitioner
For the Respondent: Mr. Rohit Arya, DAG Haryana.
Ms. Neha Awasthi, Advocate for Respondent No.3.
Mr. Manjeet Singh, Advocate for Respondent No.5.
Mr. Onkar Singh, Advocate for Respondent No.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's participation in recruitment process (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondents' qualifications and legal reliance (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's consideration of recruitment results (Para 5 , 6)
4. limited court role in academic matters (Para 7 , 8)
5. inadequate proof of mala-fide and role constraints (Para 9 , 10)
6. final judgment—petition dismissed (Para 11)

JUDGMENT

Harnaresh Singh Gill, J. (Oral)

Through this petition, the petitioner seeks issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari setting aside the final result dated 18.09.2020 (Annexure P-5), for the post of Assistant Director (Technical)/Principal, Industrial Training Institute Group A Junior.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that against advertisement No.3(5) of 2017 dated 07.12.2017, the petitioner had applied for the aforesaid posts, under Scheduled Caste (SC) Category; that the petitioner appeared for the written examination on 11.08.2020; that the result was declared on 27.08.2020; that the candidates seven times the posts, in each category, including the petitioner, were called for the documentation and that the petitioner was called for the interview on 03.09.2020.

3. At this stage, learned coun

Click Here to Read the rest of this document