SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Ori) 16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
Chakradhari Sharan Singh, CJ., Murahari Sri Raman, J.
Dr. Archana Kanungo - Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa & Ors. - Respondents
W.A. No.587 of 2024
Decided On : 15-05-2024

Advocates:
Dr. Archana Kanungo, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. Manoj Kumar Khuntia, Additional Government Advocate, for the Respondent.

Court upheld that without explicit reservation for sports candidates in the recruitment advertisement, a petitioner cannot claim preferential selection based solely on sports status.

Headnote:(A) Orissa High Court Order, 1948 - Article 4 - Letters Patent - Recruitment reservation principles - Dispute over appointment as Assistant Professor based on sports quota - Court held that there was no explicit reservation for sports candidates under the concerned advertisement, thus not entitled to preferential selection. (Paras 10.1, 10.3, 10.7, 12.8)

(B) Petitioner's claim - Lack of provisions for sports reservation in the 2020 advertisement - Court confirmed that no illegality in rejecting the application was found based on performance in the interview - Petitioner scored below the cut-off, hence disqualified. (Paras 6.8, 9.1, 11.1)

Facts of the case:
Dr. Archana Kanungo, a national-level sportsperson, challenged her non-selection as Assistant Professor, citing violation of reservation policies. Prior orders indicated no specified sports quota in the relevant recruitment advertisement.

Findings of Court:
The learned Single Judge found no fault in the rejection of the petitioner's claim, maintaining that selection criteria followed were valid and based on interview performance where the petitioner did not qualify.

Issues: The main issue was whether a reservation for sports candidates existed in the advertisement for the recruitment of Assistant Professors. Another issue concerned the legality of job appointment procedures followed by the Orissa Public Service Commission.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that without a provision for a sports quota in the advertisement, the petitioner could not claim that her non-selection was unjust; the performance in the interview determined eligibility.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. overview of appeal against non-selection based on sports quota. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments presented regarding hiring processes and qualifications. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. court's observations on legality and recruitment standards. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. legal principles governing participation and non-selection challenges. (Para 9 , 10)
5. conclusive findings and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT

Murahari Sri Raman, J.-

The challenge:

This intra-Court appeal invoking provisions of Article 4 of the Orissa High Court Order, 1948 read with Clause 10 of the Letters Patent constituting the High Court of Judicature at Patna and Rule 6 of Chapter-III and Rule 2 of Chapter-VIII of the High Court of Orissa, 1948, is directed against the Judgment dated 13.03.2024 rendered by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.7280 of 2023, whereby the appellant-writ petitioner craves for following relief(s):

    'It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue notice to the opposite parties calling upon them to fail to show cause as to why the contempt order dated 13.12.2022 issued by the Honourable High Court shall not be complied being passed in gross disregard to the earlier order passed by this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.(C) No.17348 of 2022/272 of2022 dated 27.11.2022.

    A further direction to be issued to the opposite parties to extend the benefit of direct recruitment under sportsperson Resolution No.GAD-SC-RES-0012-2022 taking into reservation principles under State Civil Services to the petitioner and Sports and Youth Services Department as per 'outcome budget 2019-2022' Resolution is Annexured, as well as judgment of this Hon'ble Court passed to State of Orissa Vrs. Dr. Archana Kanungo in W.P.(C) No.17348 of 2022/272 of 2022 dated 27.12.2022 and provide all the benefits to the petitioners as due with effect from the date of appointment to other selected candidates for the post of Asst. Professor Sociology or Professor Sociology in different State Universities and benefits respectively within a date to be fixed by this Hon'ble Court. Or else Petitioner/Appellant shall suffer irreparable loss and injury which cannot be compensated by any means. So without proper finding and without proper finding and without proper adjudication the Writ petition 7280 of 2023 disposed of by the Honourable Single Judge of Orissa High Court dated 13.03.2024 is impropriety, unjust and unconstitutional as such the order dated 13.03.2024 is liable to be set-aside.

    Therefore, it is most humbly prayed that this Honourable High Court may graciously be pleased to admit the appeal, call for record, issue notice to opposite parties the order of Honourable High Court dated 13.03.2024 be set-aside.

    It is, therefore prayed that this Honourable Court may graciously be pleased to pass an order that the 'Petitioner get direct appointment for the post of Assistant Professor Sociology, Universities Advertisement-08, 21 post as meritorious sportsperson under one 1 post reserved from one year as stay for petitioner/Appellant which is reserved for sportsperson reservation principle by GA and PG and Sports and Youth Services, Government of Orissa Resolution.

    And/or may pass any other order/orders, direction/directions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit/proper.

    And for this act of kindness, the Petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray. '

Facts of the case:

2. As adumbrated in the writ appeal, Dr. Archana Kanungo, appellant-writ petitioner, claims to be National Level Sportsperson in 'Taekwondo' having identity card issued by the Director of Sports and Youth Affairs (State of Odisha), assailed non-selection for the post of Assistant Professor in Sociology discipline in response to the Advertisement No.8 of 2020-21, dated 08.02.2021 in the category of 'Sportsperson' before this Court in W.P.(C) No.17348 of 2022, which came to be disposed of on 16.09.2022 with the following Order:

    '1. This matter is taken up through, hybrid mode.

    2. Hear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top