Back
CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Archana Kanungo – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of appeal against non-selection based on sports quota. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding hiring processes and qualifications. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on legality and recruitment standards. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal principles governing participation and non-selection challenges. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. conclusive findings and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
Murahari Sri Raman, J.-
The challenge:
This intra-Court appeal invoking provisions of Article 4 of the Orissa High Court Order, 1948 read with Clause 10 of the Letters Patent constituting the High Court of Judicature at Patna and Rule 6 of Chapter-III and Rule 2 of Chapter-VIII of the High Court of Orissa, 1948, is directed against the Judgment dated 13.03.2024 rendered by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No.7280 of 2023, whereby the appellant-writ petitioner craves for following relief(s):
'It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue notice to the opposite parties calling upon them to fail to show cause as to why the contempt order dated 13.12.2022 issued by the Honourable High Court shall not be complied being passed in g
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
