Back
CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH, MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
Archana Kanungo – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of appeal against non-selection based on sports quota. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented regarding hiring processes and qualifications. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on legality and recruitment standards. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. legal principles governing participation and non-selection challenges. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. conclusive findings and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
The challenge:
'It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to issue notice to the opposite parties calling upon them to fail to show cause as to why the contempt order dated 13.12.2022 issued by the Honourable High Court shall not be complied being passed in gross disregard to the earlier order passed by this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.(C) No.17348 of 2022/272 of2022 dated 27.11.2022.
A further direction to be issued to the opposite parties to extend the benefit of direct recruitment under sportsperson Resolution No.GAD-SC-RES-0012-2022 taking into reservation principles under State Civil Services to the petitioner and Sports and Youth Services Department as per 'outcome budget 2019-2022' Resolution is Annexured, as well as judgment
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
