HARSH BUNGER
Roshan Lal @ Billu Ram – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Ambala – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Harsh Bunger, J.
Petitioner (Roshan Lal @ Billu Ram) has filed the instant writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing impugned award dated 06.08.2010 (Annexure P-1), whereby, the reference of the industrial dispute raised by the petitioner-workman has been answered against him and his claim has been dismissed.
A further prayer has been made for directing respondent No.2 to reinstate the petitioner in service with other consequential benefits.
2. Briefly, the petitioner-workman raised an industrial dispute regarding termination of his services. The said dispute was referred for adjudication to the Labour Court, Ambala. In the claim petition, the petitioner stated that in January, 1993, he was employed as a daily wager under the respondent-Department i.e. Divisional Forest Officer, Morni- Pinjore, Forest Division, Pinjore, Panchkula (hereinafter "respondent- Management") and he worked continuously in different nurseries under various guards. Petitioner claimed that his services were terminated on 08.07.2004 in violation of the provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 194
A.Umarani v. Registrar, Coop.Societies
G.M. Haryana Roadways v. Rudhan Singh
Gangadhar Pilai v. Siemens Ltd. 2007 (1) SCC 533
Jaipur Development Authority v. Ramsahai
Madhya Pradesh Administration v. Tribhuban
Secy., State of Karnataka v. Umadevi
Sita Ram v. Moti Lal Nehru Farmers Training Institute
Talwara Coop. Credit & Service Society Ltd. v. Sushil Kumar
Termination of daily wage workers under Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act does not automatically entitle them to reinstatement; monetary compensation may be awarded instead.
Reinstatement of workmen after illegal termination is not automatic; monetary compensation may be granted instead based on specific circumstances and legal precedents.
The court established that non-compliance with statutory provisions regarding termination under the Industrial Disputes Act leads to invalid termination and entitlement to compensation.
In illegal termination cases involving daily-wage workers, reinstatement is not automatic; compensation and circumstances of employment should be evaluated.
The court upheld that an employee's continuous service of over 240 days entitles him to protections under the Industrial Disputes Act, and any termination without adherence to statutory requirements ....
The court established that reinstatement is the natural remedy for illegal termination, but monetary compensation may be appropriate for daily-wage workers under certain conditions.
In a case where Section 25-F of the Act applies the workman is bound to prove that he had been in continuous service of 240 days during twelve months preceding the order of termination; in a case whe....
Rule 33 which prohibits an employee from taking employment elsewhere. Indeed, it was not even the pleaded case of the management that during the period of suspension, the appellant had left the Headq....
Labour Law - Reinstatement in services – It is trite law that when termination is found to be illegal because of non-payment of retrenchment compensation and notice pay as mandatorily required under ....
The court upheld the illegal termination of the respondents/workmen and their entitlement to reinstatement with full back wages and other consequential benefits under the Industrial Disputes Act, 194....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.