SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2023

HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI
Rajender – Appellant
Versus
Rajender Kumar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sanjay Mittal, Advocate; For the Petitioners

Table of Content
1. grounds for tenant's eviction established (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. claims of judicial perversity not substantiated (Para 6 , 7)
3. court confirms landlord's necessity for premises (Para 8 , 9)
4. this court's limited jurisdiction in appeals (Para 10 , 11)
5. revision petitions dismissed as meritless (Para 12 , 13 , 14)

JUDGMENT

Harsimran Singh Sethi, J. (Oral)

CM-7403-CII-2023 in CR-2517-2023

As prayed for, the application is allowed.

CR-2422-2023 and CR-2517-2023

By this common order, two civil revision petitions, the details of which have been given in the heading of the order, are being decided as both the revision petitions involve the same incident.

2. Respondent No.1-landlord filed an ejectment petition under Section 13 of the Haryana Urban Control of Rent & Eviction Act, 1973 against the petitioners-respondents. While filing the rent petition, number of grounds were taken for ejectment of the petitioners-respondents, who are the tenants, such as non-payment of rent, personal necessity, the building being unfit and unsafe and the fact that the tenant had already acquired other premises where he could have shifted as well as the tenant had already ceased to occupy

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top