SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(P&H) 2187

SURESHWAR THAKUR, KULDEEP TIWARI
Dinesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate; For the Petitioner in CWP Nos.24641 of 2017, 2010, 6673, 9277, 2019, 11609, 1285 of 2018, and, 3101, 20499 of 2022.
Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate; For the Petitioner in CWP-2046 of 2018.
Mr. R.S. Malik, Advocate; For the Petitioner in CWP No.2507 of 2020, 6612, 32573, and 33188 of 2019.
Mr. Sawan Choudhary, Advocate; For the Petitioner in CWP-17845 of 2018.
Mr. Pankaj Bali, Advocate; For the Petitioners in CWP-13892 of 2020.
Mr. R.S. Kundu, Advocate with Mr. Anshul Chahal, Advocate; For the Petitioner in CWP-13259 of 2019.
Mr. Gunjeet Brar, Advocate; For the Appellant in CM-9358 of 2023.
For the Respondent: Mr. P.P. Chahar, Sr. DAG, Haryana with Mr. Parveen Mehta, DAG, Haryana.
Mr. K.K. Jund, Advocate for the respondent No.1- U.O.I. in CWP-13892 of 2020.
Mr. D.K. Singal, Advocate for the respondent No.2 in CWP No.24641 of 2017.
Mr. Anil Dutt, Advocate for the respondent No.5 in CWP Nos.2046 of 2018 and 2019 of 2018.
Ms. Sumitra, Advocate for Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the respondent Nos.6 to 37 in CWP No.2010 of 2018.
Mr. Jugansh Goyal, Advocate for Mr. Denesh Goyal, Advocate; For the Appellants-respondents Nos. 8 to 16 in CM-5027-CWP of 2023 in CWP-13259 of 2019.
Mr. Naveen Siwach, Advocate for Mr. J.S. Saneta, Advocate for the respondent No.4 in CWP No.9277 of 2018.
Mr. Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate for the respondent No.7 in CWP-13259 of 2019.
Mr. Satya Pal Jain, Addl, Solicitor General of India with Mr. Dheeraj Jain, Sr. Penal Co

Table of Content
1. state responsibility for timely deposits. (Para 1 , 2)
2. emergent nature requires prompt action from states. (Para 3 , 4)
3. compliance with directions essential for timely proceedings. (Para 5)
4. court order for updates and compliance across cases. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)

JUDGMENT

Sureshwar Thakur, J.

Today, the learned Addl. Solicitor General of India intimates this Court, that through a letter drawn by the office of Surveyor General, Survey Complex, Dakshin Marg, Chandigarh on 23.5.2023, thus the survey teams concerned, have been dispatched to the sites concerned. However, it is submitted today before this Court by the learned Addl. Solicitor General of India, that the State of Haryana and the State of Uttar Pradesh, have not yet deposited the sums of money, as were required to be deposited with the Union of India, rather, towards the expenses for erection of the boundary pillars at the sites concerned.

2. It appears that the said non-deposits, has resulted in no further action being drawn by the authorities concerned, thus in pursuance to the directions made by this Court, on 5.5.2023. The learned counsels appearing respectively for the State of Uttar Pradesh, and, the

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top