Back
SURESHWAR THAKUR, LALIT BATRA
Yahooda Mohammad – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sureshwar Thakur, J. (Oral)
One Sirdar instituted an eviction petition under Section 7 (2) of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, (hereinafter in short to be referred as 'the Act of 1961'), against five respondents, one of whom was one Jaan Mohammad @ Jaanu. The said Jaanu was an elected member of the Zila Parishad concerned, and also was the Chairman of the Zila Parishad. On the said eviction petition, a decree of eviction (Annexure P/3) became passed. Annexure P/3 was required to be enforced by the Assistant Collector, thus on an execution petition becoming filed before him, by the decree holder, one Sirdar besides through an order becoming made for issuance of warrants of possession and subsequently on successful execution of the said warrants of possession, an objective satisfaction becoming recorded by the Assistant Collector concerned, qua the said issued warrants of possession becoming completely and successfully satisfied.
2. However, the said warrants of possession remained unissued nor became executed, despite the fact that even in an appeal becoming raised against Annexure P/3 by the judgment debtor therein i.e. by one Jaanu, yet no order becom
The Assistant Collector has exclusive jurisdiction over eviction matters under the Punjab Village Common Lands Act, and actions by the Deputy Commissioner attempting to usurp this authority are void.
The court ruled that an eviction petition under the Punjab Village Common Lands Act must be converted into a title suit for valid jurisdiction, invalidating subsequent orders if not.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the legislative object of preventing encroachment on government land or public property, as enshrined in the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 19....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the necessity of a purposive interpretation of the term 'person' and the conflict of duty and interest arising from encroachment over government la....
The court affirmed that the Gram Panchayat's claim to ownership over the disputed khasra number was valid, emphasizing the binding nature of the Director's order correcting clerical errors.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
