IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RITU BAHRI, MANISHA BATRA, JJ.
Priyavart & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL-D NO.1336-DB of 2015 (O&M)
Decided On : 31-08-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of the criminal case and initial investigation details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. process and outcome of the trial proceedings. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. details of the arguments from the defense and prosecution. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's analysis of reliance on medical testimony. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 5. examination of conspiracy elements and legal standards. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. conditions for establishing culpability in conspiracy. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. discussion of admissibility of evidence and confessions. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. court's views on the weaknesses of the prosecution's case. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 9. last seen theory and its implications on conviction. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 10. assessment of circumstantial evidence and its sufficiency. (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 11. final overview of evidence and its impact on guilt. (Para 31) |
| 12. conclusion of acquittal and procedural directives. (Para 32 , 33) |
JUDGMENT
Mrs. Manisha Batra, J.
The instant appeal has been preferred under Section 374 (2) of CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE against the judgement of conviction and order on quantum of sentence dated 20.07.2015 and 21.07.2015 respectively passed by the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sonipat in Sessions cases arising out of FIR No.132 dated 08.04.2013 registered at Police Station Sadar, Sonipat under Sections 302 and 34 of IPC and Section 25 of ARMS ACT whereby the accused Priyavart, Sandeep @ Kala, Anil @ Leela, Parveen @ Kaira, Pardeep and Sumit @ Pehalwan were held guilty and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life for commission of offence punishable under Section 120-B read with Section 302 of IPC and were sentenced to pay fine of Rs.10,000/- each and in default of payment of fine were further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months. The accused Sumit @ Pehalwan was also held guilty and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for three years for commission of offence punishable under Section 25 (1-B) (a) of ARMS ACT .
2. The prosecution was set into motion in this case on 08.04.2013 when the dead body of an unknown youth was found by PW-1 Rakesh to be lying near the gate of Saraswati Shiksha Shansthan, Murthal Road, Sonepat. He had informed the owner of the school namely, PW-2 Vikas who had further informed the police. The victim was found to have sustained several fire arm injuries and spent as well as live cartridges and empties were found lying near the dead body. Post mortem examination of the dead body was conducted on the same day. Inquest proceedings were also conducted. A case under Section 30 2 read with Section 34 of IPC and Section 25 of ARMS ACT was registered. On 09.04.2013, Dharambir s/o Rishi Pal, r/o Village Purkhas, District Sonepat contacted the police and identified the dead body to be that of his son Parveen @ Parchi. He got recorded his statement that Malad resident of Village Karor, his co-brother (husband of his sister-in-law Rajbala) was brother of Sarpanch of Village Karor who had rivalry with accused Anil who was a gangster. Malad was lodged in Hisar Jail in connection with some murder case which had occurred due to enmity between accused Anil @ Leela and family of Malad. Parveen @ Parchi son of Dharambir used to visit his mausa Malad in the jail. He further recorded that accused Anil @ Leela and Sandeep @ Kala were lodged in Tihar Jail, Delhi. Accused Pardeep, brother of accused Sandeep @ Kala had threatened the victim to not to meet Malad and help him in pursuing his cases and otherwise to face dire consequences. He disclosed that on the evening of 07.04.2013 at about 8:30 PM, his son was sitting in the Chaupal adjacent to their house, when accused Priyavart, a co-villager came on a Platina motorcycle and took his son Parveen along with him. On asking, Priyavart told him that they would be returning in short time. He further stated that his son did not return back on 08.04.2013. He had made search for his son and came to know that accused Priyavart was a
Bhola Singh v. State of Punjab
Bodh Raj alias Bodha v. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Brajendrasingh v. State of M.P.
E.K. Chandrasenan v. State of Kerala
Ganesh Lal v. State of Rajasthan
Haricharan Kurmi and Jogia Hajam v. State of Bihar
Jaswant Gir v. State of Punjab
Joginder Singh v. State of Haryana
Kanhaiya Lal v. State of Rajasthan
Kashmira Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Kehar Singh v. The State (Delhi Administration)
Keshav v. State of Maharashtra
Md. Kalam @ Abdul Kalam v. State of Rajasthan
Mohd. Abdul Hafeez v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Musheer Khan @ Badshah Khan v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Puran Singh v. State of Uttaranchal
Raj Kumar Singh @ Raju @ Batya v. State of Rajasthan
Sayeed Alarm Lari @ Babu v. State of Haryana
Shailendra Rajdev Pasvan v. State of Gujarat
State of Goa v. Sanjay Thakran
State of Gujarat v. Mohammed Atik
State of Himachal Pradesh v. Raj Kumar
State of Maharashtra v. Sukhdev Singh
State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram
The court affirmed that circumstantial evidence, when established beyond reasonable doubt, can support convictions for murder and conspiracy, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of evidence....
The conviction of the appellants for murder and conspiracy was upheld based on circumstantial evidence, establishing a common intention to kill for financial gain through witchcraft.
(1) Circumstantial evidence – It is necessary for prosecution that circumstances from which conclusion of guilt is to be drawn should be fully established. Suspicion, however strong it may be, cannot....
In criminal cases based on circumstantial evidence, the prosecution must establish a complete and unbroken chain of circumstances that excludes any reasonable doubt of the accused's innocence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.