Back
VINOD S. BHARDWAJ
Ramavtar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Permanent Lok Adalat for public utility services (pus) Bhiwani – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners filed against lok adalat's award. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. writ petition filed due to non-appearance of respondents. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. claim of inadequate amenities and interest dispute. (Para 5) |
| 4. court examination of evidence presented. (Para 6 , 10) |
| 5. respondents provided amenities; claim disproven. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 12) |
| 6. ruling on obligations regarding payment despite amenity claims. (Para 11) |
| 7. judgment upheld; writ petitions dismissed. (Para 13) |
JUDGMENT
Vinod S. Bhardwaj, J. (Oral)
Both these writ petitions are being decided by a common judgement as separate petitions have been filed by Husband & Wife against the award dated 26.07.2018 passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat (Public Utility Services), Bhiwani in relation to two different Booth numbers owned by the petitioners. While CWP-25844-2018 has been preferred against Booth No. 48 situated in City Centre, Bhiwani; CWP-25922-2018 relates to Booth No. 47. The grounds of challenge & reasons for dismissal remain the same.
2. For the facility of reference, facts have been extracted from CWP-25844-2018. Briefly, the case of the petitioner is that he was allotted Booth No. 48 at City Centre, Bhiwani by the responde
The 'as is where is' clause in the brochure was deemed unconscionable and void under Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The allottee is entitled to interest for every month of delay in poss....
1. Interest will be calculated after the period of assured possession has elapsed – from when cause of action has arisen2. Arbitration is not a bar to consumer complaint
Authority must provide preferential land allotment to disabled persons per applicable legislation; arbitrary cancellations and excessive interests are unjust.
(1) Revision Petition can be re-instated if it has been withdrawn in exchange of an offer of settlement.(2) Mere possession on paper does not translate into actual possession.(3) A court-mandated all....
A subsequent allottee can claim an alternative plot if the original plot is embroiled in legal issues, validating consumer rights under the Consumer Protection Act.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
