Back
TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA, SANJIV BERRY
Devender Singh – Appellant
Versus
Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Ltd. (DHFL) (Now Piramal Housing Finance) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's background and loan defaults. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding ots and possession notice. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's analysis of legal applicability of ots. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's dismissal based on legal precedents. (Para 12) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjiv Berry, J.
Present Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned order dated 11.03.2022 (Annexure P-7) passed by respondent No.3, under Section 14 of Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, (for short, 'the SARFAESI Act'), the impugned notice dated 05.01.2023 (Annexure P-8) issued by respondent No.4 for taking over the possession of property in question and also for direction to respondents No. 1 to 4 to grant appropriate time to deposit the balance of the loan amount in pursuance to the One Time Settlement dated 25.09.2019.
2. Brief facts pleaded in the petition are that the petitioner is owner in possession of residential house fully described in para No. 2 of the petition for which he had availed loans from respondents No. 1 and
The SARFAESI Act provides specific remedies for grievances, and borrowers do not have a vested right to One Time Settlement benefits, which are subject to the bank's discretion.
The duty of a litigant to disclose all material facts and the bank's right to protect its recovery were the central legal points established in the judgment.
One Time Settlement proposals require explicit payment timelines; absence of such terms necessitates reasonable enforcement by courts.
The Court affirmed the necessity of informing the petitioner about the One Time Settlement decision under the SARFAESI Act.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the consideration of the relevant provisions under the SARFAESI Act, the availability of expeditious and effective remedies, and the non-maintainab....
A writ petition is maintainable against a scheduled bank under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, as the bank is performing public functions and is governed by the provisions of the Banking Re....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
