SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1334

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Sandeep Moudgil, J.
Jasmeet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent
CRM-M No. 35747 of 2024
Decided On : 29-07-2024

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Shivya Sehgal, Vaibhav Sehgal, Rajiv Verma

An FIR registered under a repealed statute constitutes an abuse of process and is liable to be quashed.

Headnote:(A) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 528 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 406 - Quashing of FIR - The FIR was registered under a repealed statute, constituting an abuse of legal process - The court emphasized that once an act is repealed, it is treated as if it never existed, thus invalidating the FIR - The petitioners were not criminally accountable as nothing was entrusted to them. (Paras 1, 2, 7, 10)

(B) Quashing of FIR - The court has inherent powers to quash FIRs that do not disclose a cognizable offence or are manifestly attended with malafide. (Paras 5, 10)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners sought to quash an FIR registered under Section 406 IPC, arguing it was an abuse of process since the FIR was filed after the repeal of the IPC by the BNSS, 2023. The petitioners claimed they had no influence over the household operations and could not be held accountable. (Paras 1, 2)

Findings of Court:
The FIR was quashed as it was registered under a dead statute, confirming that the registration was an abuse of process. (Paras 10, 11)

Issues: Whether the FIR could be quashed due to being registered under a repealed statute and the implications of such a repeal on legal accountability. (Paras 1, 10)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the registration of an FIR under a repealed statute constitutes an abuse of process, emphasizing that a repealed act is treated as if it never existed. (Paras 7, 10)

Result: The impugned FIR and all consequential proceedings are quashed.

Judgement Key Points

What is the effect of registering an FIR under a repealed statute on its validity?

What are the recognized grounds for quashing an FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as applied in this case?

How does the repeal of the Indian Penal Code by Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 affect ongoing or past proceedings and the status of previously registered FIRs?


JUDGMENT :

Sandeep Moudgil, J.

1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’) seeking quashing of FIR No. 64, dated 17.07.2024, under Section 406 IPC, registered at Police Station Women, Jalandhar (Annexure P-4) along-with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.

2. The principal contention put forth by the counsel for the petitioner is that the impugned FIR represents a manifest abuse of the legal process, given that the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 came into effect on 01.07.2024, while the FIR in question was registered on 17.07.2024 under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. As the married sister-inlaw of respondent No. 2-complainant, petitioners No. 1 and 2 are said to have no influence over the day-to-day operations of their paternal household. Since nothing was entrusted to petitioners No. 1 and 2, they cannot be held criminally accountable for the contested FIR, which was filed under Section 406 IPC, which requires theft and breach of trust. The assertion is that because petitioners No. 3 and No. 4 have already lost their young son and are not in a position to fight a legal battle in their later years, it is argued on their behalf that the allegations are utterly ludicrous, vicious, and far-fetched. As a result, the petitioners cannot be subjected to the ordeal of a criminal trial.

3. Learned State counsel is not in a position to controvert the factual aspect as to whether the impugned FIR has been registered on 017.07.2024 under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 instead of BNSS, 2023, which has come into force on 01.07.2024.

4. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties.

5. The Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana & Ors. Vs. Bhajan Lal & Ors. 1992 Supp (1) SCC 335 the scope of inherent powers of the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to quash the FIR has been discussed in detail. At the same time, the Apex Court identified the following cases in which FIR/complaint can be quashed:

    “1. Where the allegations made in the first information report or the complaint, even if they are taken at their face value and accepted in their entirety do not prima facie constitute any offence or make out a case against the accused.

    2. Where the allegations in the first information report and other materials, if any, accompanying the FIR do not disclose a cognizable offence, justifying an investigation by police officers under Section 156(1) of the Code except under an order of a Magistrate within the purview of Section 155(2) of the Code.

    3. Where the un-controverted allegations made in the FIR or complaint and the evidence collected in support of the same do not disclose the commission of any offence and make out a case against the accused.

    4. Where the allegations in the FIR do not constitute a cognizable offence but constitute only a non-cognizable offence, no investigation is permitted by a police officer without an order of a Magistrate as contemplated under Section 155(2) of the Code.

    5. Where the allegations made in the FIR or complaint are so absurd and inherently improbable on the basis of which no prudent person can ever reach a just conclusion that there is sufficient ground for proceeding against the accused.

    6. Where there is an express legal bar engrafted in any of the provisions of the Code or the Act concerned (under which a criminal proceeding is instituted) to the institution and continuance of the 21 proceedings and/or where there is a specific provision in the Code or the Act concerned, providing efficacious redress for the grievance of the aggrieved party.

    7. Where a criminal proceeding is manifestly attended with malafide and/or where the proceeding is maliciously instituted with an ulterior motive for wreaking vengeance on the accused and with a view to spite him due to private and personal grudge.”

6. Section 358 BNS, 2023, reads as under:

    Repeal of the Indian Penal Code:

    (1) The Indian Penal

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top