SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(P&H) 1334

SANDEEP MOUDGIL
Jasmeet Kaur – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Shivya Sehgal, Vaibhav Sehgal, Rajiv Verma

Judgement Key Points

What is the effect of registering an FIR under a repealed statute on its validity? What are the recognized grounds for quashing an FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as applied in this case? How does the repeal of the Indian Penal Code by Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 affect ongoing or past proceedings and the status of previously registered FIRs?

What is the effect of registering an FIR under a repealed statute on its validity?

What are the recognized grounds for quashing an FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C. as applied in this case?

How does the repeal of the Indian Penal Code by Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 affect ongoing or past proceedings and the status of previously registered FIRs?


JUDGMENT :

Sandeep Moudgil, J.

1. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BNSS’) seeking quashing of FIR No. 64, dated 17.07.2024, under Section 406 IPC, registered at Police Station Women, Jalandhar (Annexure P-4) along-with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom.

2. The principal contention put forth by the counsel for the petitioner is that the impugned FIR represents a manifest abuse of the legal process, given that the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 came into effect on 01.07.2024, while the FIR in question was registered on 17.07.2024 under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. As the married sister-inlaw of respondent No. 2-complainant, petitioners No. 1 and 2 are said to have no influence over the day-to-day operations of their paternal household. Since nothing was entrusted to petitioners No. 1 and 2, they cannot be held criminally accountable for the contested FIR, which was filed under Section 406 IPC, which requires theft and breach of trust. The assertion is that because petitioners No. 3 and No. 4 have already lost their young son and are not in a pos

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top