SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 225

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
MASTER ADITYA BENIWAL – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. application for admission in sainik school (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioner's inadvertent category mistake (Para 4 , 5)
3. respondents' argument on correction window (Para 6 , 7)
4. law on admissions and corrections after submission (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
5. admissions must comply with conditions (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
6. petitioner’s choice impacts others' admissions (Para 15 , 16)
7. impact of changing category on other candidates (Para 17)
8. court's rejection of petitioner's request (Para 18 , 21)
9. petitioner's request for school transfer (Para 22 , 23)
10. conclusion and disposal of pending application (Para 24)

JUDGMENT :

Harsimran Singh Sethi, J.

CM-19671-CWP-2024

1. This is an application for placing on record reply and Annexure R-5/1 to R-5/2 on behalf of respondent Nos.5.

2. Keeping in view the contents mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. Reply and Annexure R-5/1 to R-5/2 on behalf of respondent Nos.5 is taken on record subject to all just exceptions.

CM-6048-CWP-2025

1. This is an application for impleading the applicant Master Nitin as respondent No.6 in the present writ petition.

2. In view of the contents mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. The

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top