SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1364

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
ALKA SARIN
Harmohan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Rajwinder Kaur – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Parambir Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

Alka Sarin, J.

Present revision petition has been filed challenging order dated 18.12.2024 whereby application filed by the petitioners under Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for impleading the other co-sharers of the property as necessary party has been dismissed.

2. The respondent-landlord herein filed an ejectment petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 to vacate shop Nos.4 and 5 on the grounds of arrears of rent as well as her bonafide necessity. The petitioner-tenants herein appeared and filed an application under Order I Rule 10 CPC wherein they took a stand that the respondent-landlord herein was not the owner of the property and that the property had been sold to petitioner No.2 herein by way of an oral agreement and a civil suit is pending in this regard. It was further stated in the application that during the pendency of the ejectment petition it had come to the knowledge of the petitioners that there are other co-sharers and their names have been duly mentioned in the record of the Municipal Corporation. Learned counsel for the petitioners would further contend that the co-sharers are necessary party as r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top