Dhire through LRs. vs Randhir - 2025 Supreme(P&H) 1576

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1576

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
ARCHANA PURI
Dhire through LRs. – Appellant
Versus
Randhir – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Rakesh Nehra, Senior Advocate with Ms. Bindu Tanwar and Mr. Reetesh Kumar, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr.Sumit Gupta, Advocate

Table of Content
1. court jurisdiction and procedure. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. ownership claims in land disputes. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. appointment of local commissioner for evidence. (Para 7 , 8 , 10)
4. persistent filing of applications by parties. (Para 11 , 12 , 14)
5. examination of procedural correctness. (Para 13 , 15 , 16)
6. setting aside erroneous trial court orders. (Para 17 , 18 , 19)

JUDGMENT :

ARCHANA PURI, J.

1. Challenge in the present revision petition is to the order dated 04.03.2017 passed by learned trial Court, whereby, an application filed by the contesting respondents (plaintiff before learned trial Court), for leading additional evidence, was allowed.

2. In pursuance of the notice issued, contesting respondents made appearance through counsel.

3. Learned counsel for the parties heard.

4. The essential facts, to be noticed, as culled out from the paperbook are as follows:-

5. That, initially, the respondents No.1 and 2 (plaintiffs) had filed a suit for possession of the suit land, therein stating that they are owners of khasra No.1375 to the extent of 1/3rd share, in the land comprised in Khewat No.80/84 min, Khatoni No.214 min 2 Bigha 19 Biswas and that the petitioner and anot

Click Here to Read the rest of this document