SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(P&H) 1584

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RAJESH BHARDWAJ
Lachhman @ Lakshman – Appellant
Versus
Balbir Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Lupil Gupta, Varun Singla, Amresh Singla, Sanjeet Sood

JUDGMENT :

RAJESH BHARDWAJ, J.

1. Present petition has been filed praying for quashing of impugned order dated 12.07.2024 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fazilka in CRA No.185 of 2024 arising out of judgment and order dated 14/15.06.2024 arising out of Crl. Complaint bearing NACT-277-2018, under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 vide which the sentence awarded to the petitioner by ld. Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sirsa has been suspended with a direction to the petitioner to deposit 20% of compensation amount.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was prosecuted in a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short ‘the Act’). He has submitted that the petitioner was convicted by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sirsa under of the Act vide judgment dated 14/15.06.2024 and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 01 year and was ordered to pay compensation to the tune of Rs.7,00,000/- to the complainant. He has further submitted that against the order dated 14/15.06.2024, the petitioner filed an appeal before the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sirsa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top