Sukhpreet Singh vs State of Haryana - 2026 Supreme(P&H) 123

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(P&H) 123

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Sukhpreet Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. D.S. Virk, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. Mohit Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana, Mr. Deepinder Singh Virk, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J.

1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.19 dated 11.02.2026 registered under Sections 103(1), 115, 190 and 191(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Section 25 of the Arms Act added later on), at Police Station Guhla, District Kaithal.

2. Brief facts of the present case are that due to some old enmity, the petitioner in connivance with other co-accused, armed with weapons including firearms, brutally attacked one Navraj Singh (son of the complainant), due to which, he had died. Hence, the present FIR.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He argued that the petitioner was neither named in the FIR, nor has any concern with the said offence and there is no incriminating material on record against the petitioner. It has also been contended that the petitioner has been nominated as an accused only on the basis of the disclosure statement made by co-accused Lovepreet @ Labbi. Apart from the disclosure statement, there is no other evidence to connect the petitioner with the of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document