Kanhaiya vs State of Haryana - 2026 Supreme(P&H) 150

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(P&H) 150

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL
Kanhaiya – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Paras Jagga, Advocate
For the Respondent: Ms. Shaveta Sanghi, DAG, Haryana

JUDGMENT :

RUPINDERJIT CHAHAL, J.

1. Prayer in the present petition filed under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023 is for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.54 dated 22.01.2026 registered under Sections 331(6), 309(6), 238 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, at Police Station Kundli, District Sonepat.

2. Brief facts of the present case are that the petitioner along with other co-accused, entered into the liquor vend and committed robbery of mobile phone and Rs.30,000/- cash after causing injuries to the salesman-Sahab Singh. Hence, the present FIR.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He argued that the petitioner was neither named in the FIR, nor has any concern with the said incident and initially, the FIR was registered against unknown persons. He further argued that the petitioner was intentionally roped in the present case only on the basis of suspicion without any concrete evidence and the evidentiary value and authenticity of such footage is to be tested during trial. He argued that the entire prosecution case rests primarily upon the CCTV footage allegedly showing

Click Here to Read the rest of this document