Back
MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN
Prashant Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Sikkim – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rai, J.:--
After hearing Learned Counsel for the Petitioner for some time, they submit that they seek to withdraw the Petition, which is not objected to by Learned Additional Advocate General for the State-Respondents and Learned Senior Counsel for the Respondent No.3, who are present on advance notice.
The Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn.
Petitioners may withdraw a writ petition if such withdrawal is not objected to by the respondents.
A writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn when the petitioner seeks such permission from the court.
A petition can be withdrawn if the petitioners attain the relief sought, with no objection from the opposing party.
Withdrawal of petition concluded with the court's dismissal as requested.
The permissibility of withdrawing a writ petition was affirmed by the court, resulting in a dismissal of the case as withdrawn.
The court allows the withdrawal of a writ petition upon request from the petitioner's counsel, leading to its dismissal.
Withdrawal of a writ petition is permissible when requested by the petitioner.
The court permits withdrawal of a writ petition upon request, dismissing it as withdrawn without further deliberation.
The court upheld the procedural right of a petitioner to withdraw a Writ Petition.
The court upheld the withdrawal of a writ petition as per the petitioner's request, affirming procedural compliance.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
