Back
HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM
Meenakshi Madan Rai, J.
Hari Prasad Thapa (Manger) & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Controller of Examinations & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(C) No. 74 of 2017
Decided On : 24-07-2021
JUDGMENT
Learned Senior Counsel Mr. A. Moulik submits today that the Petitioners have now been appointed in the posts sought and they do not seek to press the instant Petition. That, in view of the said circumstance, he may be permitted to withdraw the Petition.
Learned Counsel for the Respondents have no objection to the prayer for withdrawal.
Considered.
W.P.(C) No.74 of 2017 accordingly stands disposed of as withdrawn.
A petition can be withdrawn if the petitioners attain the relief sought, with no objection from the opposing party.
Petitioners may withdraw a writ petition if such withdrawal is not objected to by the respondents.
A writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn when the petitioner seeks such permission from the court.
Party may withdraw a petition with the liberty to file afresh, aligning with procedural rules.
N/A
The permissibility of withdrawing a writ petition was affirmed by the court, resulting in a dismissal of the case as withdrawn.
The right to withdraw a petition with liberty to refile is recognized to facilitate rectifying procedural defects.
Withdrawal of petition concluded with the court's dismissal as requested.
The court allows a petitioner to withdraw the petition, dismissing it without delving into substantive issues.
The court allows the withdrawal of a writ petition upon request from the petitioner's counsel, leading to its dismissal.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
