Back
MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN
Sikkim Power Development Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Amalgamated Transpower (India) Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. stay application and procedural context (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. requirements for stay of arbitral award (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. order confirming stay until deposits made (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT
Meenakshi Madan Rai, ACJ. - Learned Counsel for the parties were heard on the Application for Stay being I.A. No.01 of 2020 in Arbitration Appeal No.01 of 2020, filed by the Petitioners/Appellants.
(ii) Relevantly, it may be mentioned that the Appeal in which the instant I.A. has been filed, impugns the Judgment, dated 26.12.2019, passed by the Learned Judge, Commercial Court, East Sikkim at Gangtok in Arbitration Case No.05 of 2017 [(Sikkim Power Development Corporation Ltd.(SPDCL) and Another v. Amalgamated Transpower (India) Ltd.(ATPIL)], wherein the Arbitral Award, dated 30.09.2017, was partly upheld. The Appellants, under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, the “Arbitration Act”) had challenged the Arbitral Award, dated 30.09.2017, before the Learned Commercial Court, East Sikkim at Gangtok, passed by the sole Arbitrator.
(iii) It is pertinent to mention here that in Arbitration Appeal No.01 of 2021, the Respondent herein also assails the same Judgment bein
The court ruled that a full deposit of the arbitral award amount is mandatory before granting a stay under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The court affirmed its jurisdiction to review its orders while highlighting that a mere filing of a review petition does not grant a stay on award enforcement unless complying with statutory requirem....
An unconditional stay of an arbitral award is impermissible unless specific statutory conditions under Section 36(3) of the Arbitration Act are fulfilled.
(1) There is no hard and fast rule that application made earlier in point of time must be heard before application made later in point of time.(2) Under Section 36 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act....
The court emphasized that the conditions for stay of an arbitral award should not differ based on whether a party is a statutory body, reinforcing the principle of equal treatment under the Arbitrati....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the discretion of the court to direct the petitioner to furnish security on the full arbitral award and the impact of the Arbitration and Conciliat....
Arbitration Award – Execution - By virtue of the provisions of Section 36, since it is a money decree and the Code of Civil Procedure in Order XLI Rule 1(3) mandates imposition of the terms and condi....
The court clarified that award debtors must deposit the full awarded sum as a condition for staying enforcement, emphasizing that both public and private parties are subject to the same requirements ....
Arbitration awards, lacking jurisdiction, do not equate to money decrees; interim relief granted during appeal pending jurisdictional determinations.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
