Back
THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM: GANGTOK
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Nar Bahadur Dahal (NBD) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual overview of the arbitral award, the nature of the contract, and procedural history regarding limitation objections. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. the court's initial analysis of the limitation issue and its inherent power to evaluate the legality of claims despite procedural waiver questions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. requirement to produce and examine the arbitral record as a mandatory prerequisite for deciding proceedings under section 34. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 4. the court's order to set aside the impugned judgment and remand the matter for fresh consideration upon the examination of arbitral records. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
JUDGMENT
A. Muhamed Mustaque, C.J.
This appeal was preferred by the Union of India under Section 37(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Act).
2. In an arbitral award passed by the Hon’ble Justice Pranab Kumar Chattopadhyay, Former Judge of the Calcutta High Court, as the Sole Arbitrator, the Union of India was directed to pay a sum of Rs.23,21,54,534/- (Rupees Twenty-Three Crores Twenty-One Lakhs Fifty-Four Thousand Five Hundred and Thirty-Four only).
3. The Arbitral Tribunal allowed a cou
In proceedings under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, it is mandatory for the court to summon and examine the arbitral records to determine if grounds for setting aside an award ex....
The limitation for setting aside an arbitral award begins from the date of receipt of the award, not from the rejection of an application under S.33.
The statutory limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act is inflexible, and applications filed beyond this period cannot be entertained.
Claims in arbitration must adhere to statutory limitation periods; failure to comply renders them non-maintainable, emphasizing the strict nature of limitation under arbitration law.
Limitation Act shall apply to arbitrations as it applies to proceedings in Court.
The application under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act was dismissed as barred by limitation since filed after the three-month period following the award, with no eligibility for an extension under ....
The prescribed period for filing an application under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act is three months, and the 30-day extension does not constitute part of this period.
The limitation period for arbitration claims commences from the date of the Cure Notice, and claims not filed within three years are barred, affirming the arbitrator's findings.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
